Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
Get 3000 MHz RAM instead, Intel gains a fair bit of performance from 3000 MHz in games.
Do NOT get that PSU and liquid cooler. Corsair VS is awful quality, get a CXM550 instead. As for the cooler, 120s perform worse than air coolers in general, just get a Dark Rock Pro 4.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGgJ4ivWwp4
Story time. I've been running a bunch of SSDs for years. Had been using an 850 evo as a OS drive. When I built my current machine, 8700k/1080 ti) I broke down and got a 970 evo 500GB NVMe drive. It's a fine drive to be sure, but it cost $200 for 500GB. And it's probably the purchase I regret the most. But I wasn't blown away compared to the 850 evo I had been running for the OS drive.
Early this year I was able to get an Intel 600p 2TB NVMe for ~$200, and in nearly most any case I can't tell the difference between them. I've also got a Intel 600p 2TB as the OS drive in the wife's PC. Whenever I have to work on the wife's PC, even though the 600p is half as fast as the 970 evo I'll be damned if I can notice it.
I would recommend a cheaper drive that's a bit larger. I really wouldn't go smaller than 500GB, and I believe that more SSD space equals more happiness. I'm only running SSDs these days. At any rate 250GB won't get you very far, especially with some games pushing 80-120GB.
I might recommend a bit larger power supply in case you want to get a nicer GPU down the road. Having a little headroom might be nicer. Although it's easy to overestimate power usage too so I wouldn't fuss to much if you're fine with it.
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/wPgFZf
This is much better idea.
You have some real issues with this Intel build, Ryzen is far more cost-effective at that budget enabling you to get much better graphics card.
Dont use single stick RAM, always pairs for dual-channel effect.
The Corsair VS series PSU is terrible and 450W is not enough for overclocking Intel plus GTX 1660 Ti.
That 120mm AIO cooler is trash like all the 120mm ones, simple $30 air cooler will outperform it.
Yeah I'd have to agree. Although I'd argue for going for a 1TB 660p and forgo the HDD completely or going 2TB 660p, but that's just personal preference since I'm done buying HDDs and have decided not to treat storage like the part that doesn't really matter. So feel free to ignore that bit.
The 2070S is a much nicer card, and the Ryzen 3600 is a perfectly good CPU.
Depending on your needs you could ditch the HDD and just get more NVME storage.
Oh for sure it can, you can do 1440p with my build.
If it can't not to many people have a system who can... you'll be fine for several years.
1. ADATA XPG SX 8200 Pro right now costs 3 more pounds than Intel 660p according to pcpartpicker, but is MILES faster. Comparison[ssd.userbenchmark.com]
2. 1TB HDD might end up pretty fast with modern games, consider 2TB one, or a large SSD like Brockenstein has suggested.
3. I'm not saying Gigabyte is bad, and it totally is not, but just in case check EVGA and Inno3D cards as well. Those might cost a bit more, but are generally the best quality ones when it comes to NVidia cards.