Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
In general, being an early adopter is a costly affair, often without much gain (since most goes does not really utilize it anyway) so if you have a not to old system, that pulls fine, then it is better to wait 3-6 months before buying.
If you want to see some of the stat rumours, then look at
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/11/5413843407455427280/
Current rumours say around 1000 + brand cost (so 100-200 more atleast)
Anyway the trend seems to be 15-30% increase in comparison to 20xx series cards.
Maybe that's just wishful thinking since I'm eyeballing a next gen GPU to get. I skipped getting a GPU for my yearly purchase in exchange for getting a CPU (3950x, mobo and ram to match) because performance increase over a 1080ti was too low to justify the price tag. I think the 3090 is going to replace the Titan and run at over $2000.
I'm dead set on a top end GPU, just waiting to see where the cards fall if that's gonna be Radeon or Nvidia.
No price hike? The 1080ti was like 800 for the founders where as the 2080ti was like 1200 for the founders.
I'm sure some of that was to cover the cost of R&D for the brand new tensor cores, some of that is early adopter fee, and probably some of it because they don't have any real competition at that end of the stack
There was no price hike, they rebranded the stack and added Ray tracing, which is why the only performance gain was had with the 2080ti.
Except performance between the 1080ti and 2080 doesn't reflect any kind of increase. They're damn near the same.
Which is what I said and why they are the same price...
They basically only added Ray tracing to the 20 series and reshuffled the naming scheme, I'm half expecting the 3080ti to be the 'top' gaming card with a 3090 replacing the titan at its current price point as nvidia has generally reserved the 90 designation for extreme options with dual gpu's previously.
Otherwise you're saying they just re-released the same old ♥♥♥♥ with tensor cores stapled on and a name change (performance wise). Because buying the 800 dollar card in the 10 series and then buying the 800 dollar card on the 20 series nets you basically zero benefit, minus like the 3 titles that have ray tracing support.
This isn't the first time nvidia has done this, apart from the 780ti the whole 700 line up was near identical to the 600 series, same with the 500 series comparing to the 400 series.
While Ray tracing adoption is slow, that kind of makes sense given how long games take to develop, however, when I have used it, it makes it very clear that it is the future of lighting and its odd, I found when I disabled it, you notice its not there, more than noticing that it's there when you enable it, I guess it's because it brings virtual worlds one step closer to reality.