安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題的作者已將一篇留言標為問題解答。
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I DONT GET IT ? IS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE SO CHEAP NOW ?
BUY THIS U WILL BE SO HAPPY
https://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/1000GB-Samsung-970-Evo-Plus-M-2-2280-PCIe-3-0-x4-NVMe-1-3-3D-NAND-TLC--_1292800.html
The performance is there in the numbers, but in most real world use, most users won't see much difference between an NVMe SSD and a standard SATA SSD outside of a few select workflows.
Having an M.2 port is a factor; not all motherboards or systems have them. Mine didn't until I recently upgraded.
Cost is another big factor. The drive you linked to is over $200 USD. You can get an SATA 1 TB SSD for just over half that (I know there's cheaper NVMe M.2 drives but I'm comparing to the one you said to buy).
Personally, I've bought three times more mechanical hard drives in the last 5 years than I have SSDs, though in the last 10 I've bought three of each. Two of those drives were for data and storage and it'd have been way cost prohibitive to get SSDs of that size for speed I don't need for them, and the third was for games, which is honestly hard to tell the difference of compared to my SSD in the majority of games I play (I do still tend to move the games I'm playing most at the time to my SSD). My next purchase will likely be an M.2 slot NVMe drive but it's a bit silly to wonder why anyone buys anything else. Cost; the answer is almost always cost.
to make him see it is worth it to pay a little more . for the extra performance
unless he has said i want to make RAID than i wouldn't have said anything
Becasuse some people like me didn't build their own PC so they stuck with this annoying issues, PC is from IBUYSHIT-power*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WACyyFF_ci0
A while back, then came MLC (multi layer cell).
Not long ago, they again increased density and now there's TLC (triple level cell).
QLC (quad level cell) is the next thing.
So how does this relate, if it just allows them to cram more storage space into a given area? Well, performance suffers, namely sustained write performance. I'm not 100% positive but I think durability goes down too (it's still higher than most should ever have to worry about yet, but it's worth mentioning). Every time they go up a layer "level", the additional voltage levels needed is exponential, whereas the gained space is not. It's diminishing returns, literally. QLC is really just at a point where it's gotten bad to the extent that some of them are hardly better than the faster mechanical drives in sustained writes (they are obviously much better at all else).
Further reading:
https://www.howtogeek.com/428869/ssds-are-getting-denser-and-slower-thanks-to-qlc-flash/
I don't know if your drive is QLC, but the symptom makes me think there's a good chance it is (that, and it's a Green drive). If that a recent-ish drive, I'd bet it is. My Western Digital Blue SSD is TLC as far as I know, and I think my prior 256 GB Crucial was MLC. I remember years and years ago, everyone was saying TLC was bad and to try and get MLC or even SLC drives.
so if it was QLC there is no solution to fix it or fix the problem?
I would get a 500Gb M2 nvme, clone your C drive to it, remove the old first partition and extend the D drive to the entire disk.