安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Wow, I can see the buyer's remorse coming up in a few months.
I'm still on a 1070ti and am waiting for 30xx/Big Navi for my next upgrade.
but not many games require or use it yet
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-2080-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1080-Ti/4026vs3918
+10% isnt exactly blowing it away
2080s is about a year old
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-2080S-Super-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1080-Ti/4050vs3918
+20% is a bigger improvement, may be worth the upgrade if you need the rt
There are of course some other bells and whistles included in Turing like RTX and the upgraded NVENC logic, but do you care about raytracing, and do you care about streaming? If not, the major selling points for Turing (other than performance), aren't
styling out here.
thats one good friend
also yeah the 1080ti vs the 2070s is like 1-5% difference ether way, depending on the game