Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Nah, it's good to question that. Only because as I mentioned afterwards these things will come doesn't mean they will be as good as we hope in the first place. Have you seen the Freesync ones that are not supported? Yikes
NVidia will pretty much always win above mid-range and budget cards unless they ♥♥♥♥ up really badly or AMD cards get their own equivalent to technologies currently unique to RTX.
For one they don't even have the tech.
Two, if it had ray tracing, it wouldn't be at the same price as 2080, it would be more expensive.
And the Vega 7 is a little expensive as it is, 100 dollars cheaper, and it would ''dominate'' that part of the market.
I feel that the extra tech that Nvidias offers smells a lot like what the used to offer with physx... And we all know how that tech ended.
In the end everything will be about perf per dollar. If you have a lot of money and want the best performance in the market, simply go for a 2080Ti. But if you're in the tier of the 2080, it will all depend of how Vega VII performs vs 2080 in the games you like.
This is speculative, but why do you think Jensen Huang was so salty about Radeon VII at CES[www.pcworld.com]? Because AMD made a gpu to rival the 2080 (unexpected), AMD was first to 7nm with a gpu (expected, but still annoying), and that gpu lacks the features that Nvidia spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to develop, but is still expected to hit its sales targets (implying that those features are not quite equal to the hype). Radeon was seen as dead by Nvidia - all of what was seen to be Radeon's top gpu talent had left for Intel (Jensen even joked about it). Then they come out with a card anyway that rivals all but Nvidia's top $1200 gpu simply because of die-shrink? (Radeon VII is still GCN-based Vega, with a lot of the same issues.) AMD doesn't have a lot of winning cards to play in the gpu race atm, but the cards they do play are played well.
As for ray-tracing vs. rasterization, I found this:
https://youtu.be/l0sT9JvStGY
Even with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ YouTube video quality, the differences are extremely minor at this point. Though it has existed conceptually for years, ray-tracing hasn't had anything near the resources devoted to its implementation that rasterization has. In a few years, the differences will probably be much more noticeable. For now, though, they are not. Not to my eyes, anyway.
Litterally retarded to say its good. Because then hes admiting his raytracing path is ♥♥♥♥. An there is no point in buying it.
But like I said. Vega 7 will still be on the bad end because its overpriced.
(By about 100 dollars)