Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
I run Linux and booting from mSATA SSD card (from a failed laptop) in a SATA enclosure boots Linux faster than from my hard drive. The only difference it would make for gaming would be initial load time, or loading levels. It would have nothing at all to do with frames per second.
It is possible to securely erase files. TRIM (Win7 or newer, or fstrim run from cron in Linux) periodically automatically clears blocks of deleted files for faster write speed or security-erase (using hdparm in Linux or a utility in Windows) can totally clear all blocks of the entire drive in a matter of seconds.
This is not a complete test, but just an example on an old PC with SATA2 currently downloading a game to sdb. It makes more of a difference than that because it basically eliminates head seek time, so there is no delay between loading multiple or fragmented files (and no need to ever defrag):
$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 370 MB in 3.01 seconds = 122.91 MB/sec
$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 732 MB in 3.01 seconds = 243.34 MB/sec
Granted I have a 5400 RPM drive, but the difference is gigantic.
That isn't so. You told about file fragmentation, which really doesn't matter for SSD. But it has very little impact on HDD performance also. Have you noticed UNIX filesystems nearly have no defrag utilities? Almost onnly exception is e4defrag for ext4 which shouldn't be used at all at normal circumstances. But SSD has in-block fragmentation which cause seriuos performance degradation.
You must have a terrible system if that is true.
SSDs load the OS in like 3-5 secs on all my machines. Even an 2011 Laptop that is not ubber-expensive or great specs.
The point is, the OS running SSD kills off a ton of system bottleneck. The system multi-tasks like lightning now; even with Games installed to 2nd HDD.
No it won't however it helps not have pop-in or stutter from that.
Its basically loads things up quicker, i have my windows 7 intalled on an SDD and it is much more quicker than i had it on my HDD. Sometimes i use my SDD for gamming and get better game performance.
OS takes minutes to load, etc...
SSD = seconds to load up OS
when you click apps, there is zero waiting, it splashes and its loaded up, done
Stop writing....
And i cant delete this section