Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Motherboard (apparently it isnt that)
and i have 16gb of ddr3 ram. would ddr4-5 help at all?
Also
At this point the best thing to do would be to use MSI Afterburner
setup the On screen display to show the CPUs and GPUs usage
CPU usage for the CPU
GPU usage and Core/Memory clocks for the GPU
See what they show up as in game, if they arent what they should be then thats partially one of your issues
This anything to go off of?
As for the GPU usage, thats because of the resolution being used.
So in this instance, it sounds normal for the current circumstances.
is it still underperfoming or is it closer to what a 1080 ti can do?
And being as your GPU usage is around 70%, yes its underperforming because of your monitor.
One thing to try
Go into the NVIDIA CP
Turn off Shader Caching(not important but try it anyway)
And under Power Management, select Prefer Maximum performance
Multi display/mixed, select Single Display performance
Click apply
then test it again
That is why you need to benchmark. Google 3dmark and unigine. Run the program and share the result. You can do the same with the in-game benchmark tools in GTA and other games.
control panel..
You have a monitor that's limited, most likely 1080p at 60Hz.
So think of it this way. You live in a city where the fastest speed limit is 60MPH. You're not allowed to go faster else you get a speeding ticket. So you can only go 60MPH and no faster, ever.
Your friend has a BMW 500 series. It can go 60MPH and it's a nice ride. No issues. It reaches the max speed limit and handles all the twists and turns just fine.
You, for some reason, thought you needed a Porsche 911 and bought it so you could go 60MPH faster.
Wait a minute....maybe you get to 60MPH a little faster, but you can't go faster than 60MPH. What good is that Porsche doing for you other than looking flashy?
You've put a high-end card in your system that's limited by the external hardware (your monitor). You will be limited by what your system can allow it to do. Right now, your monitor is a big limiting factor.
Anyway, hopefully lesson learned about buying computer parts just because they sound good and might look good and they're praised about being all powerful!!! You need to buy parts that fit your overall needs and compliment your current hardware. If you have plans to buy a better monitor, then great. No real harm. If you expected amazing performance on 1080 at 60Hz utilizing a 1080Ti, you're just letting yourself down by wasting money on a card that's much more powerful over what you need.
You should have stuck with the 970 and waited for Volta or found a 1070 or 980Ti if you really wanted some extra umph in your system. It would have cost you much less and giving you a solid jump in performance if you were having issues on 1080p with any games.
And i did the 3dmark benchmark test, the "timespy" test, and my computer as a whole scored 8168. my gpu scored 9834 and my cpu scored 4168. this any good? or relative to what other people with similar systems get to me?
hm, my gpu scored better than another 1080 ti by 300 score, but my cpu was half the score of that benchmark.
i know we have been over this, but could it possibly be my cpu holding it back?
nvm, other way around maybe?
i assume nothing is wrong seen as there is no replies? in which case, yay i guess