安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Also RDR2 was meant to run within a range of 30-60 fps, and basically nothing outside that.
We can't know how things will develop over the next few years, but as long as you don't mind turning the odd setting down a bit, you should be fine.
If you want bigger resolution and hz rates, you're going to have to learn to turn down other settings with nearly any video card.
Not doing research isn't "not getting money's worth", it's the user's error as usual. Each game will run differently than another, most "competitive" repetitive games have limited shapes, textures, etc that impact performance and are usually in enclosed areas which has a lot to do with performance.
Some games will easily run that, others will not. Some due to optimization of lack thereof, or demand of higher resources by increasing increasing resolution and hz rate.
How do you think the vehicle would react to the weight on the roof?
Do you think the vehicle could go the same speed as the truck with such a heavy load without needing to use far more fuel?
Would the tires and roof be able to handle the load? Probably not.
While the 1080 is no geo, you can see the reason (in your case probably not) behind my comparison is you're asking for more when there's limitations;
increased Hz rate = increased GPU demand
increased resolution = increased GPU demand
larger resolution and larger hz rate in addition to high settings = extreme demand instead of low to medium.
The video card is not 2020 manufacturing, it was released in 2016 which means 2015 designs so you're being entirely unreasonable about saying "but its current year!" to a 5yr old part that you're asking to do too much out of, whereas I've also mentioned larger games with larger settings demand more compared to tiny map FPS games like CSGO which barely need much to run.
Then you have the engine itself, programming, optimization etc which can vastly impact performance as well, which has little to do with the GPUs capability, so much as how the game/engine can handle and pass loads between the correct parts.
You keep saying 1440p 60FPS but you also dont mention if you're attempting 60Hz or greater than 60Hz. Balancing settings is entirely easy, reasonable, and some games are highly unoptimized for reflections/lighting/shading which can drastically harm FPS while turning them down or off can result in a huge surge of performance. It comes down to everything, not just the GPU.
Welcome to PCs, where you buy based off of your wants and change settings if somethings not working as you wish or upgrade parts if the performance isn't up to unrealistic standards based on failure to research or understand the age and limitations of parts and software.
Know what I did when performance wasn't good enough for me? I built a workstation, I can play games while I do everything else without any performance hit to my GPU.
Know what you buy, know what to expect, expect different games to perform differently with different settings/hz/resolution. If you don't like it, go to 1080p or get a stronger GPU.
They're a AAA company, you can take your complaint to them or actually wait like ordinary users do when the performance isn't how they want it to be. If a 2080Ti (without you saying EXACTLY what hz rate and resolution or leaving out one) dips below, post in the games section instead of just thinking it's the GPU. Classic case of users not understanding that any one small thing can throw a wrench into everything.
Lastly; you expect only what benchmarks show, and nothing else, at all. These usually come from the manufacturer themselves or typical sites that list each part, and the general settings and show you the exact result of the benchmark. You do not get to make expectations other than benchmarks with similar hardware as yourself, and even then the slowest part or one bad setting can actually hold a GPU back or throttle it down impacting performance. Temperatures also come into play in which I am going to say you have no idea what your CPU/GPUs temperature is as those can also directly affect performance.
The main issue here is not only the game itself, but you, not so much the equipment. Your attitude is very poor and your understanding of the hardware and associated software is why you're having issues on top of the game issue. Are you even sure youre using a full-speed pcie slot?
I have a gtx 1080 (which will be replaced by rtx 2080 super)
I7 10700K
Asus STRIX Gaming Z490-F mobo
16GB DDR4 3600 MHZ ram
are these specs bad and its my fault that the games are failing to run at 60 fps? you tell me, of course ignoring the fact i have a gtx 1080 at the moment because my complaint is about the 2080 super performance, not my 1080 which is performing well for its age
Cyberpunk graphics are different to RDR2. From what I have seen cyberpunk graphics look fairly lightweight from a visual standpoint. Lots of blur, poor lighting effects and pre-rendered lods. I could be wrong. There is a graphics review by digital foundry.
RDR2 is definitely a lot higher standard. Plus cyberpunk is going to have new versions of rtx and dlss support afaik for which you may need a 3000 series gpu. Is the cyberpunk 2080S custom still going to happen?
Regarding buying a gpu, wait until benchmarks are known. rtx and dlss mean nothing for games that don't support them. So should be excluded from any comparison, treat them as a bonus. A 2080S will bottleneck a 10700k at 1440p.
I have a 1080ti, was going to buy a 980ti and I'm glad I didn't. The extra cost has been worth it. There will be probably be a 3080 ti and will be a 3090. Pricing may depend on availability of amd's big navi gpus.
It's known that one of the ampere cards beats a 2080ti by 31%. Why would anyone be considering blowing serious money on a 2080S, without knowing what 3000 series cost?
.