is g sync worth it?

[owenkj]

from those who have experience using a gsync monitor would you say it is worth it?

[𝔇ave]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Snow:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από 𝔇ave:

Sorry mate but you're wrong. You 100% do not need vsync enabled when gsync is. Perhaps you don't have experience enough with gsync.

I'm more than aware of how G-Sync and VSync work, and I've already explained why G-Sync doesn't remove tearing. Here[blurbusters.com] are all the explanations and tests from a well-known and respectable source, that prove what I just said. If your next response will be once again based around your personal experience instead of facts - you may as well not send it at all, as I don't see a point in proving basic facts about PCs.

Ok pal 👌

[Grimy_RIck]

V-sync comes into play when you go above your monitor refresh rate, G-sync stops tearing when below monitor refresh rate its as simple as that, you can start trying to get technical and playing on words but this is as simple as it needs to be.

In my opinion, Yes G-sync is worth every penny, Proper G-sync that is, i tried a G-sync compatible and was not as impressed.

[I Did It 4 Teh Lulz]

Don't need vsync, just cap your fps below its refresh rate and enable gsync. Now enjoy tear and input lag free gaming.

[Azza ☠]

It depends...

For example: If you have a Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti via DisplayPort cable to an UltraHD 4K HDR monitor that has 120Hz refresh rate or higher, then you will find a G-SYNC HDR (also known as Ultimate) a must-have!

G-SYNC comes in different forms, so monitors saying G-sync compatible aren't actual modules. G-SYNC Ultimate on the other hand is a module chipset that works inside the monitor. So long you get at least 30 FPS, it will sync the monitor Hz output to the FPS input, up to it's max refresh rate allowance.

This gives you a tear-free, stutter-free and more smooth experience, when you can't fully max out the monitors Hz. Allowing you to future proof as well with a higher-end gaming monitor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT8f_1oRsLU

A G-SYNC module I would strongly recommend if you have a Nvidia graphics card trying to juice a high refresh rate monitor 120Hz or more, which won't always be maxed out and might have frame drops with hardcore gaming such as explosions, fps, racing, etc.

G-SYNC modules however add a cost factor of up to $500 extra (for the high-end ones which also support HDR - High Dynamic Range).

It's not worthwhile if your graphics card can't juice more than 30 FPS at all times for the monitor resolution. In this case, it would be better to invest that same money in a higher-end graphics card upgrade. Also, it's ideal to have as much refresh rate as possible, more the better, at least 120Hz, but ideally 144Hz or 165Hz. As the G-SYNC range can go up to that, giving you a much bigger range for games that can max it out more. Some games, such as CS:GO will dish out massive FPS, compared to other games, such as GTA 5. Yet both will work at their peak butter smooth.

[Snow]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Grimy_RIck:

V-sync comes into play when you go above your monitor refresh rate, G-sync stops tearing when below monitor refresh rate its as simple as that, you can start trying to get technical and playing on words but this is as simple as it needs to be.

To remove tearing, you do need VSync both below and above your refresh rate. With VSync off you get tearing. That is in fact as simple as it needs to be, but you guys keep giving G-Sync properties it doesn't have because of the lack of knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cNLfu3TpdY

[SoldierScar]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Snow:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Grimy_RIck:

V-sync comes into play when you go above your monitor refresh rate, G-sync stops tearing when below monitor refresh rate its as simple as that, you can start trying to get technical and playing on words but this is as simple as it needs to be.

To remove tearing, you do need VSync both below and above your refresh rate. With VSync off you get tearing. That is in fact as simple as it needs to be, but you guys keep giving G-Sync properties it doesn't have because of the lack of knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cNLfu3TpdY

I never notice this with freesync enabled and framerate locked with rivatuner 3 fps below max hz setting, giving me perfect frametimes and buttery smooth image.

[Revelene]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Snow:

To remove tearing, you do need VSync both below and above your refresh rate. With VSync off you get tearing. That is in fact as simple as it needs to be, but you guys keep giving G-Sync properties it doesn't have because of the lack of knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cNLfu3TpdY

I'm another that can chime in saying that I use GSYNC without vsync and I get no tearing. I'm sorry if you're having issues using GSYNC, but that doesn't mean everyone else is having the same issue.

[garv]

yes

[EliteGamer]

What about older G-SYNC monitors? I've noticed now with recent NVIDIA drivers, it now says "G-SYNC Capable" in NCP where it used to just say "G-SYNC" with my PG279Q.

Have NVIDIA been putting G-SYNC labels on monitors for years and they really not G-SYNC???

[𝔇ave]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από EliteGamer:

What about older G-SYNC monitors? I've noticed now with recent NVIDIA drivers, it now says "G-SYNC Capable" in NCP where it used to just say "G-SYNC" with my PG279Q.

Have NVIDIA been putting G-SYNC labels on monitors for years and they really not G-SYNC???

No.. if you have a gsync module built in to the monitor then it is true hardware gsync.. not long ago NVIDIA decided to give gsync support to select freesync monitors but it's only software simulated. Your monitor has true gsync that performs the way it should. Software simulated gsync Can have issues depending on the monitor. Some perform well while others do not

[retro_Ed]

First lineup Nvidia G-sync laptops were sold as G-sync but did not have a G-sync module.
Everything was handled by gpu & software.

So basically from day one Nvidia has used open Adaptive sync technology with their products.
It just has been false marketing.

is g sync worth it?
YES
Yes answer is when just looking g-sync tech itself. It offers tearless gaming within gsync range and with vsync enabled it widens it above it with normal sync method.
Tech itself is good, no doubt about that.
(I am using Nvidia Linux drivers.Windows users may experience differently.)

NO
Adaptive / Freesync, It just works.
When comparing two techniques: gsync vs adaptive/freesync price is main issue.
Buying ~150€ more expensive gsync monitor will not offer 150€ better gaming experience.

Like I wrote, Nvidia itself has used on laptops, non-module "gsync" which proves that software, adaptive sync technology is good enough even for Nvidia.

Look quality gsync compatible monitor. With this it opens future purchase for both
(...or three, Intel) gpu makers and not locking just for one brand.

[Grimy_RIck]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Snow:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Grimy_RIck:

V-sync comes into play when you go above your monitor refresh rate, G-sync stops tearing when below monitor refresh rate its as simple as that, you can start trying to get technical and playing on words but this is as simple as it needs to be.

To remove tearing, you do need VSync both below and above your refresh rate. With VSync off you get tearing. That is in fact as simple as it needs to be, but you guys keep giving G-Sync properties it doesn't have because of the lack of knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cNLfu3TpdY

I often agree with most of the advice you give Snow, but in my opinion the advice you give here is wrong, as i have already stated G-sync totally eradicates tearing below the screen refresh rate, V-sync only comes into play once you are above your monitor max refresh rate, i have tested many monitors with and without G-sync, and G-sync compatible more recently, this is my opinion of course from my own personal testing, i may add i am very very very fussy and can tell the difference between fps in a heartbeat and a single tear i cannot deal with, hence why no matter how many different monitors i try i still stick with my 1080p 240hz monitor, i never have V-sync enabled, i use rtss and cap my fps at 220 G-sync keeps my frames in check without a single tear, just the same as unlocking fps and enabling V-sync.

[Grimy_RIck]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από retro_Ed:

First lineup Nvidia G-sync laptops were sold as G-sync but did not have a G-sync module.
Everything was handled by gpu & software.

So basically from day one Nvidia has used open Adaptive sync technology with their products.
It just has been false marketing.

is g sync worth it?
YES
Yes answer is when just looking g-sync tech itself. It offers tearless gaming within gsync range and with vsync enabled it widens it above it with normal sync method.
Tech itself is good, no doubt about that.
(I am using Nvidia Linux drivers.Windows users may experience differently.)

NO
Adaptive / Freesync, It just works.
When comparing two techniques: gsync vs adaptive/freesync price is main issue.
Buying ~150€ more expensive gsync monitor will not offer 150€ better gaming experience.

Like I wrote, Nvidia itself has used on laptops, non-module "gsync" which proves that software, adaptive sync technology is good enough even for Nvidia.

Look quality gsync compatible monitor. With this it opens future purchase for both
(...or three, Intel) gpu makers and not locking just for one brand.

I disagree here, in my personal opinion G-sync is worth it compared to G-sync compatible or Freesync monitors, if you want totally seamless gameplay go G-sync, if you are not so fussy or do not have the funds then go G-sync compatible or Freesync.

[Grimy_RIck]

If you want your gaming to be as smooth and stress free as possible i urge you to get a G-sync monitor, it just makes gaming soooooo simple either way, regardless of the discussion around how G-sync/V-sync work together you will be much better off with G-sync, i spent so many hours messing around with freesync or G-sync compatible monitors trying to get G-sync quality, you would not believe me, honestly its so simple with G-sync you just turn G-sync on and V-sync on or Rtss on and cap at whatever you want, G-sync will pick it up, your gaming will always be smooth as you like.

[EliteGamer]

I prefer using G-SYNC with V-SYNC off. I don’t like the input lag with V-SYNC on and with my 165hz monitor, if my fps goes over my refresh rate in esport games, the tearing isn’t that bad like it is with a 60hz monitor. Like others have said, with a G-SYNC monitor, you don’t get any tearing within the G-SYNC range. I’m gaming at 1440p ultra, so I’m usually around the 120 FPS mark in demanding games, so no tearing. I do recommend a G-SYNC monitor.