安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Either way, no matter what you do, each kit will run Dual Channel. So it makes no difference how you buy them.
It's just simply 4 same models of RAM sticks there were tested in a group, closely from same production line/batch.
In modern days, it makes no difference.
Back when Quad Channel was a new thing, it actually mattered.
If you going to use all 4 DIMM slots, difference between quadchannel kit and two dual-channel is negligible. I never even been able to better oveclock former of those. But, ofc, it looks possible that quadchannel kit could be overclocked slightly better. Or could not. Unpredictable.
I've not looked into the memory much, but aurous has just launched an interesting kit where it comes with 4 sticks for the sake of looks / rgb pimp'ness but only has 2 working sticks of actual RAM, the other 2 are just dummies with the lights.
So they may be a slightly cheaper option.
Beyond that, look for the cheapest option , be it 2x16 or 4x8.
I personally use 8x4GB to populate all slots as it looks cooler than 4x8GB, so I appreciate wanting all 4 sticks :)
End of the day, performance will be all but identical.
@Monk that dummy module is actually pretty cool. i never would have known of such a thing if you hadn't mentioned it :)
Its not, the rest is used as cache for windows, and closing chrome is too much trouble
yeah, not sure what capacity they come in or the memory modules they are using, but i reckon its a great idea and i see more brands offering, as empty slots dont look as good lol