Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Minimums though, well that can often depend alot on your CPU as well, not just GPU. And some games are sometimes just poorly designed and for such too.
Assassin's Creed Odyssey is a huge resource hog and even the 2080 Ti can't really pull of what I'd call "high refresh rate gaming" at max settings. Watch Dogs isn't known for its optimization either, heh.
If Google around which settings to turn down to get a good framerate without sacrificing image quality. I think for AC:O it's something dumb like cloud quality. Huge impact on performance, little impact on graphics. Kind of like grass in GTA V. Grass quality on Ultra in GTA V nukes the framerate by almost half and it really makes very little difference to image quality.
Some average framerates I get at 1440p in games, just for comparison (and keep in mind that the 2080S is still better than the 1080 Ti by a bit, at least 5%). These numbers are more like "feels like" estimates rather than hardcore measurements. Running an 8700k at stock boost clocks and 16 GB 3200 MHz memory.
DOOM Eternal: around 120FPS, very rare dips to high 70s
Far Cry 5: 100FPS, rare dips to mid 80s
GTA V: around 100FPS with grass turned to High
Fortnite: more or less stays at the 162FPS cap (I have a 165Hz monitor)
Vermintide II: around 100FPS, dips to mid 60s during intense fights (though VT isn't really that well optimized either).
Note: Watchdog 2 needed more than 16 GB RAM while Youtubevideo in other monitor.....
However it looks like there is gpu bottlenecking occurring, so you might want to wait. I'd try to do some research on what the AC Vikings game might need.
At high pixel densities it should be possible to turn down sharpening effects. I do this on a lot of games - using 4K dsr on a 1080p monitor because I have a 1080 ti which is bottlenecked by the cpu. DSR looks better and there is less texture flutter.
The thing about gpus is that they cost a lot at the top end. I'd be inclined to wait the maybe 3 months to see what nvidia will release. Supposedly 2000 series are being cleared from manufacturer inventory for 3000 series release at Computex in September. It's not that far off. If you want 5 years use I'd definitely wait. The new gpus might be display port 2 as well.
Thanks for these, that helps a lot. It seems everything runs at above 60 fps which is what I want
The fact it doesnt stay above 60 constantly even with those specs is disapointing..