Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Or even a 60% board.
Razer keyboards are fine.
No they are not.
Coming from the owner of one.
So you like forced software in order to use it's functionality and their flashy but poor built quality?
You like how their separated their old gear into legacy sofwares?
Nice... good for you.
For the OP.
Eather go logitech or corsair... avoid this brend by a mile.
(Other than design flaw of stabilizers, but that's not unique to this keyboard.)
And my Deathadder Chroma works fine after like 5 years, all I had to do was solder a new switch in once it died from NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR.
Razer, in my experience, is a perfectly fine brand.
It's optional. You aren't FORCED to use Synapse.
I agree, that is a poor choice, it should be all one software.
Corsair keyboards aren't without issue either.
My friend has non-stop issues with keys not working properly on his keyboard, 2 replacements, still does it. The edges of his K70 are sharp too. They're using Cherry switches (which aren't that great tbth.)
Logitech keyboards are good, but still, not without issues.
Razer is a fine brand, it's fine that you're against it, but don't push your biases onto other people, without evidence. (Proper, not anecdotal.)
Synapse is not optional but a must if you want to customize even your basic keyboard layout.
What razor provides for its prices you coud always find better counterpart at the same price range.
It's not a poor choice for legacy vs new synapse... it's just razer being razer.
Those have nothing to do with biases but only facts.
No, you're actually being pretty biased and not actually providing anything but your own opinion on Razer. That isn't factual, it's an opinion, and opinions are biased as a general rule.
You also seem to be trashing the entire brand based on one bad experience you have, rather than just not recommending the particular products from the brand that people have more issues with and don't like anyway, and some people will have less or more distaste for certain aspects of the product than you did, assuming the product is actually working as it should and didn't come damaged or faulty.
I had a pretty bad experience with Corsair's silent switch version of the STRAFE, half of it was just bad design, the rest of it was just bad luck. LEDs died, the space bar was abysmal, and the overall build quality was absolute ♥♥♥♥ for the price (it was priced the same as the K70 boards but it's just a hunk of plastic; I don't recommend the STRAFE models for this reason).
I don't hate Corsair for that one experience, and I still use other Corsair keyboards, mice, and mousepads regularly.
As for Logitech... I've used numerous Logitech products over the years, and I have to say that their mice and sound systems are superb. I've used sound systems, mice, and keyboards. I like the first two for sure and still use their speakers, but I prefer Razer's keyboards over Logitech's for sure. Each brand has good specific products and a lot of trash, and you can include the entire Romer-G switch type in that trash can, because they're among the worst mechanical switches I have ever used, and I've used a LOT of different switches types and brands. Logitech has only made a few gold-mine level mice products, about the same as Razer's hits, but Logitech has quite a few issues in of itself that doesn't make me like them that much.
So my opinion on who does what best, based on quality and popularity:
Corsair: Keyboards
Razer: Mice
Logitech: Speakers
Synapse being forced in order for hardware to utilize it's marketed functions is not my opinion or bios... it's a fact.
Old hardware being screwed over on legacy sofwares such as older synapses is also a fact and not my personal bias.
And if you want to go about how you can get a better product for the similar price range razer offers...then you coud find a ton of other ,,opinions,, around the forums and reviews.
Yes, and true all my experiance of buying differend brands along with razer led me to establish that the brand is far behind it's competition. That is built quality and forced software wise...
That might be the only thing that counts as my own opinion and has nothing to do with being biased or not...
Razer's DeathAdder series has been one of the most successful mouse lineups in the entire market. They're all on an even playing field; they excel and fail in their own ways.
Besides, the OP is interested in Razer, not much need to argue that "RAZER BAD!!!!!111" when all brands have problems.
So did Logitech g502.
I used to own a G502. It had just as many problems as DeathAdder did (different issues), but the DeathAdder is more comfortable and it's cheaper.
I really didn't like the G502 much, but for some reason a lot of people do.