Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Adding input lagg should always be avoided.
No, it shouldn't. That's why it's a setting that can be changed.
In a CPU bottlenecked enviroment, this will increase FPS, which will reduce input lag.
https://github.com/CHEF-KOCH/nVidia-modded-Inf/blob/master/Docs/NVIDIA%20Profile%20Inspector/nVidia%20Inspector%20Options%20Explained.md
I had my TV set to high-speed FPS for a movie, but I keep lose to battle online on my PS4. But then when I set it to a gaming mode, I get better at battle online.
User > Mouse/keyboard (Polling rate, processing speed, sensor or switches) > USB processing speed > OS processing inputs > Program processing inputs > GPU rendering frames (depends on when the data of movements was sent to the GPU in the form of scene info) > Monitors buffer setup > Monitors actual input latency. (And from there, to some degree, response time, but thats kinda moot.)
The monitor is only a fraction of what's effecting latency.
This is misinformation. It can be reduced. And there are a number of methods that can reduce it or improve it.
Can be lower.
You realize how idiotic that is?