Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
The 1650 is a 75w card. (Sometimes pulling slightly more.)
And your CPU won't pull that much.
You won't even reach half the capacity of the PSU.
Edit ; My bad, I didn't see the Super part.
No it shouldn't even be close to 300~400W, even under load. The problem isn't the amount of power itself, it's just that the PSU quality is far from ideal and may experience a failure given its age.
People who know their stuff abide by tier lists, where they won't use anything below a certain tier depending on the hardware that needs to be powered.
1650S has a TDP of 100W, the i5-2400 has a TDP of 95W. The combined power consumption under load shouldn't even reach 300W unless he has a lot of other components in the system drawing power and the 1650S is overclocked manually.
1650S usually doesn't even draw its TDP of 100W under gaming loads, it's a VERY efficient design.
They RECOMMEND a 350W PSU for the 1650S, it doesn't pull more than 100W in most situations.
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1650-super.c3411
TDP and recommended PSU are two different things entirely. They recommend a 350W PSU for the entire system, not the GPU alone. The only gaming GPU from NVIDIA (At least from this generation) that pulls 350W is the 2080 Ti (usually when manually overclocked).