SaNz. Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:48am
Do the games load faster when only the operating system is on the SSD and the games on HDD?
Please only Yes/no answers, i dont want overcomplicated answers :D

Thank you!
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Snow Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:53am 
Yes, because their saves/settings and stuff like DirectX will be on SSD. Just a bit faster.
Omega Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:55am 
Possibly. It really depends. If you have a lot of crap running from C: which is contantly accessing the disk your games can load faster, since it's the only thing using that disk.

Will this make any meaningful difference? Probably not.
Bad 💀 Motha Apr 15, 2020 @ 10:12am 
Some games wont, unless on the ssd. But yes this config of os and apps on ssd and games on a hdd helps greatly overall. The biggest thing every user will see and notice a real world difference in is having os on sdd improves everything the PC does and loads. It's a night vs day difference as os on hdd is the biggest problem back before ssds as this was mainly what slowed everything down for the most part as a hdd can't multitask data very well, something that's no sweat to an ssd.
Washell Apr 15, 2020 @ 10:15am 
Vs OS on HDD, games on SSD: no
Vs OS on SSD, games on SSD: no
Vs OS on HDD, games on HDD: yes
It's a bit more nuanced than that but:
Originally posted by caxxl:
only Yes/no answers
Last edited by Washell; Apr 15, 2020 @ 10:15am
Bad 💀 Motha Apr 15, 2020 @ 10:21am 
OS on HDD will always create a system wide botteneck, so never do that.
r.linder Apr 15, 2020 @ 7:20pm 
It's hard to give a simple "yes or no" answer when it depends on what's running, specifically.

OS should always be on an SSD. Games, however, depends on the game itself. Many games won't need it, but others will.
_I_ Apr 15, 2020 @ 8:45pm 
it depends on the game

game installed on hdd vs ssd will make very little difference if
games that use streaming or compressed data, do not use the disk as much as cpu/ram
games that use large uncompressed files can all be read fast enough if the data is defragged

game installed on ssd will be faster if
game uses large uncompressed files and has loads of disk usage while loading/playing
(gta5 is a good example of this)

either way os on the ssd will make a bigger difference, improved system performance and driver/dll loads will be near instant, instant browser load, boot time in under 15sec
Carlsberg Apr 15, 2020 @ 8:54pm 
Correct me if i am wrong but i do not think you can read and write data at the same time to the same drive. Two drives mean two data paths which can be simultaneous, one drive would mean more wait time while cpu is either reading or writing.
_I_ Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:16pm 
hdds have cache to store small amounts of data to be written/read to/from disk
older drives 8-16mb, newer are 64-125mb+

not at the same time, but pretty close, burst rate can max the sata3 controller for that amount
Omega Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:19pm 
Originally posted by Carlsberg:
Correct me if i am wrong but i do not think you can read and write data at the same time to the same drive. Two drives mean two data paths which can be simultaneous, one drive would mean more wait time while cpu is either reading or writing.
There are more variables which matter. Such as the speed of the disk and interface and how much the disk is actually used by things other then your game.

And more even complex variables can play a role such as parts of the disk which are cached in your system memory and the OS temporarily storing data in the memory instead of writing it to the disk immediately.
Washell Apr 15, 2020 @ 10:16pm 
Originally posted by Carlsberg:
Correct me if i am wrong but i do not think you can read and write data at the same time to the same drive. Two drives mean two data paths which can be simultaneous, one drive would mean more wait time while cpu is either reading or writing.
Queuing for an ssd would still be faster than waiting for a hdd.
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 15, 2020 @ 9:48am
Posts: 11