Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1440p ultra-wide is what I would consider the highest yous should go with a 5700/5700 XT.
it can run 4k, but not anywhere near max or with games in the next 5 years
2060s uses much less power and has more stable drivers
5700xt or 2060s could be enough for 1440p near max, but not with games in the next 5 years
for more future resistant, go with 2070/s
Yes, 5700XT is fine for 4K gaming. Not 4K Ultra, no GPU is, not even the 2080ti. But for 4K at reasonable settings that far exceed consoles *and* are true native 4K yes, its a fine card and will work great. Figure mostly high settings, except on the newest games in which case plane to run a mix of mediums and highs.
Speaking from experiance as someone that runs AMD 4K daily. I use the Vega 64, which is roughly comparable, but slightly behind, the 5700xt.
I play 4K-60 in GTAv, MCC (reach, CE, 2), Borderlands, BF-v, BF-1, Apex, The Forrest, Killing Floor 2, Far Cry 5, Monster Hunter World, Outerworlds, Alien Isolation and a few others. All within the past 2 months. Have been using it for 4K daily since Jan 2019.
I would say that any card comparable, which the 5700xt is, should offer comparable performance.
Again though, at 4K, be reasonable with settings, look into what *needs* to be maxed to look good, and what can run a touch or two lower to gain back the FPS. At that rez you might find not every single thing needs to be 100% maxed out. 80% maxed settings with 4K rez is often far better than 100% ultra at 1080.
Most argue that 1440p ultra is best compromise, but having both 4K and 1440P screens, I can easily see the difference between the two now that I am used to the detail 4K gives. If you play games where seeing at a distance is a good thing, you will love 4K.
I have a 5700XT. Have even made some videos with it at 4k (check the videos in my profile). It's a 4k Low-Medium gpu. Sure I could load up Just Cause 2, which can be maxed in 4k and say, "See, it runs 4k max settings!" But the truth is nobody cares about how well a 5700XT runs old games. It's assumed they'll run well. The newer stuff is what people care about. And for newer (within the last 3 years) games, the 5700XT will hit 60fps in 4k with a mix of Low and Medium settings.
Case in point:
https://youtu.be/IoGZ9afV-N0
Nothing. Litterally nothing. From Intel, AMD, or Nvidia, runs AC:Odysey at 4K max.
And it doesnt even have the graphics looks or anything else to make it worth it, its just a super crappy game with horrid optimisation on PC platform period.
How about you bring us a reasonable example. I listed multiple, and you went and chery picked a widely known bad apple as a bad example.
Lolz
What games have you honestly strugled to run at 4K if not at least at medium or better?
Only game I have personally tested that needed *any* lows, or any forms of major rez scaling not to have lows present was the afore-mentioned AC:Od which again is a known resource hog...
Admittedly, it's been a while since I last tested it as its frankly a huge hastle to swap gpu now it's mounted vertically and see no real need to do so, so the v64 sits on a shelf.
But ok. Here's a game that is biased towards Radeon and always has been. A mix of Low and Medium settings at 4k.
Gameplay begins at 8:40
https://youtu.be/C-usS3RPqvM
if it cant run current games at 4k maxed on it, no way will more demanding games released in the next 5 years maxed at 4k
Anyone that *has* to have all maxed out or nothing doesnt like 4K.
Those that *do* like 4K tend to compromise on settings.
Fun-Fact: Its always been that way, and probably will be for some time yet. Even *if* the next gen cards can push current titles at actual maxed settings 4/60, it will be less than a year before new games make them unable to do so anymore...
And by the standards amy of you seem to apply, at that point its no longer a 4K cappable card...
Heres a pro-tip:
I dont know a *single* person who actually uses 4K for their daily gaming, refardless of setup, that runs the games 100% maxed. Its both un-needed, and a major waste of performance at such a rez in many games. Its *always* been this way on 4K, even when the R9-290X was the 4K king in 2013. Same rules apply today, even for a 2080ti. You compromise.
Anti-aliasing was always the first to go at 4K, then shadows. When I started having to drop textures from high to medium was when I finally decided to move to 1440p. Modern titles like Far Cry 5 / New Dawn, The Division 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider I had to drop to 1440p for the better gaming experience.