安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
GTAV was originally a PS3 game, so both the PS4 and Windows versions are basicly ports. And Witcher 3 was simultaniuosly developed for 3 Systems, not exactly a performance wonder on either.
Anyway, i think consoles have more potential (Wich doesn't shine in most crossover titles). You think they're glorified mini PCs. We're not gonna see eye to eye.
I enjoy both systems equally. This console/pc feud is helping noone..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK6DdTBTZ14
The thing is I also love consoles. Just got 150+ upvotes on reddit defending consoles in PCMR lol. It's not console/pc thing here, it's facts/suggestions. The most powerful console out there, X1X, has multiple settings in RDR2 below the lowest possible in PC version. And that console is an upgraded version released just 4 years after the basic console exactly because the basic one had no potential at all, both PS4 and X1 were pretty mediocre at launch, and low-end just 2 years later. Come on, we're talking 750 Ti level here, that's not what potential looks like.
It looks like most of your knowledge about consoles come from PS3 era, because its architecture was so complicated it took years for developers to learn how to make good use of that hardware. It's questionable if that should be called potential, or just lazy developers, but it definitely wasn't the case for 8 gen consoles with their standard laptop hardware, and is not going to be the case for 9 gen.
GTX 970 is good, 1920x1080p high settings 60 fps in GRID 2019.
My RX 580 4GB (GTX 980 performances) is just slightly faster and is a strong GPU for 1080p high settings FXAA/CMAA for every game paired with 2x8 GB RAM.
I really, really hope you're right about this, because Microsoft is pulling out all of the stops in an effort to finally kill PC gaming for good.
There's no doubt that the X Series is very impressive, for a console. What also seems obvious is that MS is planning on taking a gigantic loss on these units--way more than ever before--in its effort to both stop console gamers from fleeing to PC, and to entice PC gamers to console in the wake of ridiculous GPU prices combined with a disturbing slow-down in GPU innovation (The avg. NVIDIA GPU cycle was always ~14 months. RTX took 29 months to release (on paper) with mediocre gains, and we're looking at another 24+ month cycle back-to-back. When one looks at generational gains, one has to take into consideration the period over which those gains occurred. Annual % gains over the last 4 years have really slowed.)
Between Windows 10, people being convinced that laptops are legitimate for serious gaming, and everything else, there is a lot to be concerned about for anyone who does not want AAA PC gaming to disappear from the face of the earth.
While the GPU of the X Series is outclassed on release, the CPU is ~4 times more powerful than last gen if the specs are accurate. Combined with additional RAM, if nothing else this should hopefully allow us to FINALLY see some actual innovation in AI and physics, which means innovation in gameplay and not just graphics.
Imagine a $500 Console with 2080 performance? I don't know how they do it, but that's just insane. This Console might actually surpass my PC for half the price, which is really scary to think.
There's nothing mysterious about it. They're taking a piece of custom HW that costs $1,000 to make, and instead of selling it at $1,200 for a $200 profit, they're selling it at a gigantic loss.
They do this for two reasons: 1. Because obviously almost no one is going to buy a $1,200 console, and 2. They make their money back over the course of 7-8 years with all of the licensing, royalties, certification fees, XBox Live passes, etc. Plus the fact that the HW itself costs less and less to manufacture as it gets more and more outdated.
When the new consoles arrive Itl take ages for most pc users to catch up with hardware to compare. Take shredder for example
Yeah, I read a very detailed description of the X Series HW the other day, and it's clear MS spent far more than ever before--almost every aspect was given special attention.
That's not true though. On the last gen, the Xbox One was released in the same year as the 4770K (the CPU I'm still running), and yet the 4770K was already ~5 times as powerful.
The GPU was also underpowered on release, but not near as underpowered as the CPU. That held back AAA gaming in a huge way, as the CPU limits AI and physics innovation, which in turn limits gameplay innovation.
If the X Series CPU is really 4 times more powerful than XBO, it won't match a 4770K, but I'm hoping we'll finally see some really interesting gameplay innovation for the first time in over a decade.