安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Otherwise look at Samsung 750 / 850 EVO ones.
As Bad-Motha told the MX300 is a great choice giving a extra 35 GB over other brands.
I also "own a Crucial", though sticker says its ADATA, from inside is 100% identical to Crucial M550. Works great. Yay to rebranding.
Crucial MX300 is also good cause it's newer 3D-NAND; similar to what Samsung is using now.
Crucial branded products only use Micro chips. But Crucial does not rebrand ANYTHING.
Now just cause u may find another SSD with similar chips or controllers as a Crucial SSD or RAM; doesn't mean it's rebranded, trust me.
Micron is like Samsung in some ways; they are a major brand that actually produce their own chips to go in many devices; SSDs, RAM; HDDs, GPU VRAM, Phones, Tablets, SD/MicroSD and other forms of USB Flash as well... many brands out there rarely make alot of their owns stuff when it comes to the chips. Many brands blue-print a product and maybe the general board layout, and such; but the chips/controllers/chipsets come from one of the few major brands out there who make them.
Use SSD for anything where Speed is a real need.
OS, Apps, Game Clients, Photoshop, Video Editing, Rendering software, CAD.
and even Games; provided you have room for them and also for games where that game will actually benefit alot from being on SSD instead of a HDD.
SSDs don't like to lay idle and rarely used; it's just not a good idea.
Get a WD Purple or Black 2 or 4 TB for Storage. Something along those lines.
Techreport made a review on this, the third pic compares it exactly to the Crucial M550, can you tell the difference which is which? I couldn't
http://techreport.com/review/26252/adata-premier-pro-sp920-solid-state-drive-reviewed
And yupp, there is no need to use SSD for Storage, unless you have a game which you play very often and loading times are a way too long for you. But OS benefits from it greatly, I have booting time of 7-8 seconds.
Of course you can if you have the buck and use a small SSD for OS and a big one for games.
And lack warranty.
THAT is where the differences are.
Overall, SATA is SATA; you generally won't see a huge difference in timing/wait when compared to say a 300mbps SSD vs a 550mbps SSD
But another thing is that; if a slower SSD of say 300mbps READ; well you can be assurred that is the highest (if that) when it comes to WRITE. So buying say a 550mbps rated SSD for SATA-III is much better; because you also get a much higher write speed.
Think of it this way.
Can you tell a huge difference between an ISP; 50mbps -vs- 100mbps download speeds?
Not really. Unless you are downloading huge files and comparing those times alot.
Now consider a Cable ISP; most have high downloads, slow uploads.
Can you tell the difference between 1mbps -vs- 10mbps Upload; sure can; and Upload helps quite a bit anytime you wish to upload something online; like to Cloud, Facebook, Dropbox; etc...
Think of the WRITE speed on an SSD in this way. The SSD read will generally be fairly decent; they all are really when compare to any HDD out there.
But high WRITE speed and IOPS helps much more overall.
I agree; something like ADATA or other cheaper Mushkin, OCZ, Kingston SSDs;
vs say the more robust ones from say Crucial, Intel, Samsung; you can feel the differences.
For me; Samsung 850 EVO 500GB at around the $150 range is a bargain I can do.
It's well worth it.
Mushkin has a wide range of SSDs too; so there is that; but ADATA, OCZ, Kingston, I would seriously just avoid.
Crucial MX300 series is most more robust and on-par with Samsung 850 EVO series.
Above and beyond those older, cheaper ones Crucial had months or years ago.
Y'all need to stop me
Where as Crucial MX300 1.1TB vs Samsung 850 EVO 1TB; is a difference of around $65-75 in pricing between those two.
So generally yes; any of the Crucial MX300 series are good bang for buck.
This could be on my door by Monday but I can't honestly drop $500 right now. Honestly if I could afford it I'd rather go intel with their pci storage but oh my gosh, why can't they make these in black