Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Agreed. No point in going up within the same series unless there is not a new series out.
1660ti and 2060 price is more or less the same in my country for most brand anyway.
I'd be looking at the GTX1070ti/80, I see too many driver complaints on the RTX line to dismiss them.
GTX1060 to the vanilla GTX1070 isn't a big enough jump.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1797-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-ti/
And then there's that ^, my preference is 8GB Vram though.
Vram allocation and usage are 2 different things. It's very unlikely any game can use more than 6GB at 1080p. Games like Metro Exodus don't max out my 8GB of Vram at 4K.
interested in ray tracing, get rtx 2060
if not, get the cheaper gtx 1660ti.
If they were the same cost I'd be looking at the 2060 then. 1660 only if you could save money. Even if you don't care about RTX or DLSS, at the same cost the 2060 is slightly ahead in traditional loads. And the 2060 is just about neck and neck with the 1070 in performance, depending on the game. Unless you found a 1070 for a much better price than 2060 of course.
1660 is slightly better than a 1070. 2060 is closer to a 1080.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of7u6_dU2SI
Turns out 1660ti is way cheaper than 2060 & 1070ti, should i just buy 1660ti instead? idk i'm really confused rn.