Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- What's your PC Specs
- Budget for new monitor
- Monitor size and resolution you're looking for
Overall, if it doesn't have FreeSync or GSync, then it's pointless.
Are you going to see a difference? Maybe. I don't have your eyes, but I would notice. Our eyes don't see in frames. You see, it's all about tricking the brain into thinking the game is fluid motion. The more frames visible, the better. 240hz means you can show 240 unique frames per second.
It doesn't have FreeSync or Gsync, so frame rates under or over 240 will bring the no-so-great visual downsides to no syncronization. Vsync would introduce more latency, so the frame time gains would probably negate or not have that big of an effect. Typically, these "professional gamers", which is who this product is targeted, don't care about screen tearing or other visual issues and only want the lowest latency possible.
Honestly, if you really want to go with a 24 inch 1080p 240hz TN monitor, then I'd recommend the Asus PG258Q. It has Gsync and will be a much more enjoyable experience over the XL2450, if you have an Nvidia GPU.
A good G-Sync Monitor isn't cheap though.
Otherwise just stick to 1080p/60Hz/IPS