Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Include your PC specs and budget to get the most responses.
MASSIVELY overpriced. 300-400 pounds less and it would be a "maybe".
Not sure why you deleted your other thread earlier.
If you want a system already built try https://www.overclockers.co.uk/
they build based on specs you ask for with a warranty and it'd be cheaper than currys/pcworld. Plus Overclockers staff have a clue. currys and PCworld don't. It took them years to start listing monitor refresh rates after I asked about it on some monitors they had on sale. Other examples include selling systems and laptops with enough ram to run the OS and nothing else requiring buyers to add more ram.
I could go on with more examples but you should get the idea.
Oh and plenty of user here will happily spec you a system to build yourself or have Overclockers or another retailer build it for you if you provide a budget and say what you intend to use the system for.
Seems kind of overpriced.
Do you already own a system that you could upgrade.
Like if you had a pc case, some hard drives, a decent PSU, case fans etc, you could buy a motherboard, processor, ram and depending on current gpu, maybe upgrade that in 6 - 12 months.
I mean I think you're pretty heavily biased on the GPU end. The 2060 is a midrange card and I'd go so far to say based on https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam also provides some perspective, most people are running much weaker hardware.
Intel CPU's aren't all that sensitive to RAM speeds. Yeah, the SSD is too small, but that's pretty common I feel like. A. A lot of people still aren't sold on the premium for large SSDs even given the relatively low prices. B. SSDs being included in (midrange and lower) OEM builds is still relatively new. C. The reality is people buy more systems in lower price brackets. So some nicer hardware would be preferable, but it would raise the price and fewer people would buy it either because it exceeds their budget or they just don't value those improved hardware choices like you do.
Never seen a prebuilt system someone couldn't grumble over the price about. If you're buying a prebuilt system you're invariably going to be paying a premium for not having to acquire and assemble the parts yourself, you're paying for the convenience of someone else doing it. But sure, if you shop around you can always find something that's priced just a smidge better too.
I've just upgraded pretty much all of my system (except harvesting a 4tb mech drive for storage and a GTX 970, which is old I know but holds up fine for a few more months) to a 3700x / x570 Aorus Master and I'm using a lesser card than the 2060, without issue.
As for price, if the OP isn't against building a system, then he/ she will get better tech for price - this is why I ask if there is a current base they could build upon.
You claimed it was low end, and low end has some pretty negative connotations. So when you're saying "I'm not saying the 2060 is bad at all" can you see how that doesn't match up?
The 1660 and 1650 cards are all slower. Although I am expecting you to argue that they're separate lines and the 2060 is the lowest end RTX card is what you mean... in that case I would argue it was unfortunate you didn't qualify your statements properly.
I am sticking to traditional performance and am not putting everything on RTX performance or inclusion as a feature. I'm also not going to pretend RTX and GTX cards can't be compared when ray tracing isn't in question, which is most of the time... the 1600 cards are the entry level cards...
It's debatable you understand this yourself. But opinions are subjective, even mine. I'm just thinking if you're thinking a $300 - $400 GPU that can run most games at 1080p at max settings and is passable for 1440p, is low end... my opinion is you've got a funny perspective.
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/Qw92jp
OP asked was it any good and my first comment couldn't have been clearer. I said "[2060] graphics card is low end of the current tier". This is true, it's the lowest 20xx.
I also said "which isn't bad, but it's far from a highly desirable card on today's current systems", which is generally also considered to be true.
As for desirability, people don't desire a 2060, they might buy one (and that's fine, its current gen entry level, nothing more), but more likely they desire a 2080 or Super or Ti.
I'm not going to reply to you here again (your derailing the thread unnecessarily) - you're acting like I called it a low end card and I didn't - I said clearly - it was low end of current 20 series cards.
No disrespect to Currys, I have had a few TV's and toasters from them over the years but their knowledge and range of PC stuff is awful so they don't deserve your custom. It would be like buying fine wine from Tesco that's heavily marked up in line with the wine specialists; it makes no sense.
Well my motherboard is a GA-990XA-UD3 with a amd 6100 6 core. I have 8 gigs of wam and a 500gb hard drive.