Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Not hard considering it's a port of a Xbox 360 game originally released in 2010 with only slight enhancements for modern systems. I play it in full 4K 60 on my RTX 2080. Not that there is anything wrong with the game, I personally love the Halo games, but they're not new games.
I'm getting one to upgrade from my 970. I only use 1080p >55" so it should be great. I dont see a reason for any PC gamer to be using less than that by Q4
>1660 is low end garbage!
Huh?
Gears 5 is a new game running on a modern game engine (Unreal 4). You can't compare this to an old Halo port from 10 years ago that originated on the Xbox 360. Halo Reach doesn't even have any new graphics textures.
The new Halo won't be out until 2020, and you won't be able to run that well at "1440P Max settings".
The next Halo in the The Master Chief Collection will be Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary which won't be anymore demanding than Reach is.
Wut?? It's like 30 to 40% faster than a GTX 970! 🤣🤣
Maybe 20 FPS ultra 1440p