Going from 1600x900 to 1920x1080 (Ho much fps would I lose)

[bob]

Just wondering how much fps would it take if i go for 1080p. Using 900p currently.

[Komrade]

Specs?

[bob]

Originally posted by christmaS:

Specs?

Ryzen 5 2600 (stock cooler)
Rx 570
8gb ram (2667 mhz)
250gb ssd

[Komrade]

Originally posted by saltA:

Originally posted by christmaS:

Specs?

Ryzen 5 2600 (stock cooler)
Rx 570
8gb ram (2667 mhz)
250gb ssd

I would highly advise selling that RAM then getting 2x8GB 3200mhz CL14/16 RAM, it makes a big difference.

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

Your specs are plenty good for 1080p, would not worry about that.

[bob]

Originally posted by christmaS:

Originally posted by saltA:

Ryzen 5 2600 (stock cooler)
Rx 570
8gb ram (2667 mhz)
250gb ssd

I would highly advise selling that RAM then getting 2x8GB 3200mhz CL14/16 RAM, it makes a big difference.

Yeah I was thinking of getting 3200 but I was on a tight budget sadly :'( .

[_I_]

about 40% if gpu limited

1080p = 2m pixels
900p = 1.4m pixels

just look up what games you play and how well the rx570 does

for most games you will need to lower settings to play well at 1080p

[Snow]

Originally posted by _I_:

about 40% if gpu limited

1080p = 2m pixels
900p = 1.4m pixels

just look up what games you play and how well the rx570 does

for most games you will need to lower settings to play well at 1080p

If the only thing graphics card does was colouring the pixels - we won't be needing more powerful cards for newer games. The actual difference will be way less than 40%.

Just checked The Witcher 3, all ultra, GPU bound in fields. 78 fps is 900p and 63fps in 1080p, so around 20% loss in this particular game.

[_I_]

at 900p odds are it is not gpu bottlenecked
but at 1080p it will be

[Jamebonds1]

Originally posted by christmaS:

Originally posted by saltA:

Ryzen 5 2600 (stock cooler)
Rx 570
8gb ram (2667 mhz)
250gb ssd

I would highly advise selling that RAM then getting 2x8GB 3200mhz CL14/16 RAM, it makes a big difference.

Not true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhhqtBlXPzY

@saltA I'm afraid it is not make any difference that much with a higher speed RAM on the most high demand graphic game.

[Snow]

Originally posted by _I_:

at 900p odds are it is not gpu bottlenecked
but at 1080p it will be

Odds are you exclude everything but rasterisation, which is a wrong approach, to the point in games with lots of graphical features like The Witcher 3 it's easier to achieve 2160p 60fps than 1080p 144fps despite the x4 difference in pixel count.
https://imgur.com/a/TRcB7h1

Originally posted by Jamebonds1:

Not true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhhqtBlXPzY

Those are GPU-bound tests. They can't and don't reflect RAM speed performance difference.

[Jamebonds1]

Originally posted by Snow:

Originally posted by Jamebonds1:

Not true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhhqtBlXPzY

Those are GPU-bound tests. They can't and don't reflect RAM speed performance difference.

Like I said, it is not make any big difference due to limited monitor speed from a digital input.

[Snow]

Originally posted by Jamebonds1:

Like I said, it is not make any big difference due to limited monitor speed from a digital input.

You do realise digital video output bandwidth can not anyhow affect difference between RAM and L3 speeds, right?

[_I_]

144fps takes alot more cpu

[Snow]

Originally posted by _I_:

144fps takes alot more cpu

I didn't say it doesn't take more CPU. I said extra frame in graphical intensive game also takes a lot of GPU, and in graphical intensive games like The Witcher 3 x4 resolution takes roughly as much GPU power as x2 FPS.

[DeadPhoenix]

Ryzen CPU's gets massive boost from Faster RAM. Intel CPU's not so much.
But it also depends on the games you're playing. CPU intensive sees a bigger boost than GPU intensive games.