Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Well you did mention overclocking in your original post as a disadvantage of the i5-9400F, so I assumed you cared about it, and maybe wanted to try in the future :)
Anyway, good luck in your projects.
will allow non k to be overclocked, and might be able to unlock cores or ht
they are all basically the same chip, intel bins them depending on performance or bad/poor cache/igpu/ht ect..
id go for the 9400/f and hope it can unlock and overclock good with a good cooler in the future
or the 9600k/kf and cooler and oc
We'll be going for the i5-9400F and try to get it second hand less then 120€. If it can be overclocked, we'll try 4.2GHz - max. 4.4GHz. If not, we'll set all cores to max boost clock while keeping core voltage as low as possible.
Combined with the GTX 1660 Super it should be able to run the mentioned games just fine.
Thank you all for your inputs and suggestions.
The Ryzen series are really good and cheaper too. I've been using AMD CPUs for a long time, not one of them has overheated or let me down in the time i've used them.
You won't get higher frequency than the 4.1 GHz from the turbo boost. The Z board only enables to apply the single core turbo boost clock on all cores with a non-k processor. Not the overclock (multiplier) that you mean.
some z boards can fake the non k as a k cpu and overclock anyway
Do you mean overclocking via the Base Clock (BCLK)? That's the only other way I know of overclocking on a Z motherboard, since they have an external Base Clock. The overclock via BCLK can be very unstable bc it affects other components aswell. The gain from such a BCLK OC can be meager.
He's better off going for the higher clocked i5-9500F. Also with a higher multiplier, increasing the BCLK will yield a higher frequency gain compared to the i5-9400F.
The price difference is 20$. That's absolutely worth.
i5-9600K and i5-9500F both at ca. 200€. i5-8600K ca. 220€...do these prices make any sense?
All intel mobos allow some overclocking by raising the cpu multiplier. But with a 1660 super you won't need it. For example I have a non-k cpu with maximum turbo of 3.8. I run it a 4.3 on all cores with a z mobo and a $20 cooler. That is a 10% benchmark improvement. If it was a k, then maybe it could get to 4.7.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvSumDimfS8
It's just not to give you a false sense of expectation. You might not hit 4.4 GHz OC via the BCLK frequency, maybe not even 4.2 GHz.
For 4.4 GHz you need a BCLK of 107.4 MHz,
For 4.2 GHz you need a BCLK of 102.5 MHz.
Noone can guarantee that you will achieve such a high BCLK.
Increasing frequency via the BCLK induces adjustements to the other components aswell, since their affected by the BCLK. It's not as easy as changing the multiplier.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6d7w5A8t9U
Get the 9600k as you have a good cooler. And if one day you move to a better gpu & monitor then your cpu is good. I'm in AU. The 9500 prices increased a lot recently.
may not be stable or need more voltage to do it
he would need to see which upgrade profile works best, they all have slightly different base/turbo multi defaults