coNNect Dec 5, 2018 @ 6:33am
Kingston A400 240 GB
so kingston a400 is on sale so i was thinking about getting it because i didnt own ssd before,i just want to check there is no compatible issues ..I got A320M motherboard..


< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Get a WD Green SSD or WD Blue SSD instead.
Omega Dec 5, 2018 @ 6:49am 
Originally posted by WAN Gordy Freeman:
Get a WD Green SSD or WD Blue SSD instead.
WD Green SSDs are dirt slow compared to the A400 while also being more expensive. WD Blue is faster then the A400 yet nearly 2x as expensive.

The Kingston A400 and Samsung 860 evo are currently the best bang for the buck SSDs. All the other stuff is either a lot more expensive or a lot slower.
coNNect Dec 5, 2018 @ 3:25pm 
Originally posted by Omega:
Originally posted by WAN Gordy Freeman:
Get a WD Green SSD or WD Blue SSD instead.
WD Green SSDs are dirt slow compared to the A400 while also being more expensive. WD Blue is faster then the A400 yet nearly 2x as expensive.

The Kingston A400 and Samsung 860 evo are currently the best bang for the buck SSDs. All the other stuff is either a lot more expensive or a lot slower.
So is there gona be any problems or not ?
Autumn_ Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:12pm 
No. Plug it in and itll work.
Talby Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:26pm 
^ agree have few of the A400 120gb, very good deals
meheezen Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:29pm 
i'd avoid some SanDisk SSD's, but i've never had any issues with Kingstons.
i'd say, go for it
Autumn_ Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:34pm 
Originally posted by meheezen:
i'd avoid some SanDisk SSD's, but i've never had any issues with Kingstons.
i'd say, go for it
Which sandisks? Becuase ive been running an ultra ii 240 for the past 2 years. And its like the day i got it.
meheezen Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:42pm 
Originally posted by Autumn:
Originally posted by meheezen:
i'd avoid some SanDisk SSD's, but i've never had any issues with Kingstons.
i'd say, go for it
Which sandisks? Becuase ive been running an ultra ii 240 for the past 2 years. And its like the day i got it.
the early models, apparently they have a cheap controller that fails to report the actual health of the drive, "lying" they are all good when they are not.
you can find them on sales from time to time.

my SDSSDA480G just corrupts any modern filesystem, but does work albeit slow with older systems, a friend of mine has a SD8SBBU-240G and its been nothing but trouble with the "new" AppleFS
Autumn_ Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:50pm 
Originally posted by meheezen:
Originally posted by Autumn:
Which sandisks? Becuase ive been running an ultra ii 240 for the past 2 years. And its like the day i got it.
the early models, apparently they have a cheap controller that fails to report the actual health of the drive, "lying" they are all good when they are not.
you can find them on sales from time to time.

my SDSSDA480G just corrupts any modern filesystem, but does work albeit slow with older systems, a friend of mine has a SD8SBBU-240G and its been nothing but trouble with the "new" AppleFS
Huh. Ill have to check that out sometime.
Talby Dec 5, 2018 @ 4:51pm 
agree I also thought the sandisk "plus" models had problems and the "ultra" models were good, I have an ultra 480g based on that...
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Dec 5, 2018 @ 6:33am
Posts: 11