安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Right, the first logical post, thank you Bad Motha.
While possible, I can't justify another £600 monitor, I also want to game on one and have the desktop/internet on the other, I'm not looking for multi monitor gaming / one large display.
"I do not recall asking if it will effect performance or recording or whether a USB monitor is better than a DVI/HDMI connection"
This statement says that I do not RECALL ASKING if a USB monitor is better than a DVI/HDMI connection.
I did not ASK if it was, I stated that I do not RECALL ASKING, as I DID NOT ASK, this was in reply to _I_ who told me to "use dp, dvi or hdmi for displays not usb".
Right, I misread what Bad Motha said, I thought he meant two monitors side by side in portrait, which he didn't, so my post about another £600 monitor was silly sorry.
Ok, space to the left of my monitor is 2", to the right is 4" and above is 8" (due to wall mounted shelves), a second monitor above would not fit, although two in portrait side by side would, which I wouldn't want to do anyway.
Again sorry for my first reply to Bad Motha.
K, we cool
DP already. Get another display that hdmi at the very least on it.