Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
How well 12 does depends on the game, but Microsoft claimed it would improve efficiency and results. They can't prove the claim because it depends on how well the game dev implemented it.
Try it and compare your performance with DX11 and 12, and choose whatever seems more stable.
Looks like it's exactly how Omega said - it makes better use of multiple CPU cores.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtpuLpizaq8
So why are gpus listed with the version of DX that they natively support?
Because it supports the software. It doesn't mean DX12 itself is affected by hardware.
Look at the R9 300 series from AMD. They didn't support Vulkan and DirectX12 at launch because they weren't released yet, once these APIs released these cards had awesome support for them.