Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
2) That ADATA SSD is really cheap, slow, and prone to failure. A friend of mine on a budget who bought that exact model said it didn't even function when he unboxed it.
3) If you're going to get a Ryzen 5, don't get an APU, seriously. You're better off saving for a longer period of time until you can afford a 2600 and RTX 2060 or better. There's no point in going with a small budget when it's going to be trash after Zen 2 architecture releases this spring/summer.
4) If you're going to use a HDD for game storage, at least get a FireCuda hybrid drive.
5) That PSU is a little bit on the cheaper side, even if it is SeaSonic and modular; Any PSU can have a good brand name on it and have modularity, what matters is what's inside, and I wouldn't get anything less than a FOCUS Plus Gold.
tl;dr
This entire build you have planned is not a great idea, especially with Zen 2 on the horizon, and those new Ryzen 3 CPUs would destroy the value of the 2400G. If you're that tight on a budget, wait for Zen 2 Ryzen 3 CPUs (not the APU) and get a dedicated GPU to get the most of your spent cash.
2) What would u suggest?
3) I don't even know about the zen 2 price will be in my region, if it fits my budget, then I'll stick to it for sure.
4) Little bit more pricey than the HDD, but again, if it fits my budget, why not.
5) I'll get the focus gold since the price difference is not too big.
So, +-$500 is my budget. That build, on pcpartpicker costs me $501.63, but on my region, it costs me $595.59. So, I won't go too far from around $500.
Thanks for your input!
Anyone actually paying for that crap? Damn. These days mid-range - always go AMD.
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/gMQG3C/gigabyte-b450-aorus-elite-atx-AM4-motherboard-b450-aorus-elite
Best bet would be try to fit in a 2600 on a b450 with a 1050ti, should be doable just over the 500 budget.
The OP is on a budget, or did you miss that part? Next thing you know you'll be talking him into spending tons of money on a system they cannot afford.
An APU is fine to start with. The Ryzen 5 2400G has four cpu cores hyperthreaded, so after you get your dedicated gpu a year or so in the future, you'll still have plenty of power for something like an RTX 2060.
Graphically, the 2400G slots between an RX 550 and an RX 560. Not very powerful at all. Especially when you consider that the dedicated graphics in an APU use the DDR4 system ram as video memory; it doesn't have its own dedicated GDDR5 like the RX 560 does. The APU is still incredibly capable for integrated graphics, and can provide some decent frame-rates with reduced settings. Here's a video of the 2400G playing Battlefield V.
https://youtu.be/Srb8ufOfnJ0
There are tons of videos like this on YouTube. Have found Tech Epiphany's to be decent.
One thing APUs do rely on is fast ram. 3200mhz is a good speed, but see if you can find 3200mhz ram with a CAS latency of around 14 or so (the ram in your build is CAS 16, which will be fine if there are no other options, but a lower latency will provide a little bit more performance).
Disagree. Hybrid drives are a waste of money. Just go for a single SSD. A 480GB SSD should do to start with, and you'll have all your speed issues taken care of. Among the cheaper SSD brands, I use Crucial and Kingston.
That psu is fine, I have one powering an APU computer I built for my parents. Has been running strong for 18 months with no issues. "Gold" vs. "Bronze" has nothing to do with build quality; it's a measurement of power efficiency.
I've built a few APU builds in the past. I did a Richland build a few years ago (A10-6800k) and a Godavari build more recently (A10-7870k). Both turned out to be reliable performers, if not exactly powerful. So long as you're aware of the integrated graphics' limitations, you probably won't be disappointed by it.
tl;dr
- You need to make sure the older B350 motherboard's BIOS has been updated to handle the newer APU
- Find 3200mhz ram with lower CAS latency if you can; a "nice to have," not essential.
- I recommend a single 480GB (or larger if you can afford it) SSD. The cost should be about the same as your SSD + HD arrangement that you have here.
Decent parts list, just needs some tweaks.
so the 256GB better that 128GB?
I couldn't find that motherboard on the online shop in my region. (Here's the link [www.enterkomputer.com]
I couldnt find 3200mhz ram with lower than 16 latency.
Could you suggest me a good B450 motherboard which will fit my current budget? How about ASRock B450 Pro4 or MSI B450M Gaming Plus? Sure I'm planning to do upgrades on the other components.
...That's literally why I suggested he save up for longer rather than settle for something that can actually get more than acceptable results. You can pay 500 for a system that runs, or you could pay 1000 for one that can do so much more with the money you spent.
My honest opinion is if you can't afford a decent mid-range system in any configuration, you're better off buying a console instead because any entry-level system you build will need to be upgraded much sooner, especially with advancements in CPU and GPU architecture being more frequent, with DXR, DLSS on Nvidia's side, AMD hinting at their own RTRT tech, as well as 7nm process CPUs and GPUs coming this year. A console will give better performance results if you resort to Vega graphics on the chip, and about the same with a 1050 Ti for less money. Entry level is pretty redundant unless the game is only on PC, which is becoming less common anyway with very popular games like Fortnite.
MAYBE if the rumors about Ryzen 3 3rd gen are true, there will be a Ryzen 3 CPU that compares to current gen Ryzen 5, which is quite a huge deal considering the price brackets aren't really going up at all. It's a big fat maybe, but if true, there's no point in getting a 2200G.
Even AC Origins which is said to be DRM infested still ran great on my PC other then some loading frame hitches which is Ubisofts fault for even adding VMProtect to protect Denuvo which is probably causing these issues considering it has to encrypt/decrypt game files.
Also get a r3 2200g instead of the 2400g, you will still be able to play games and buy a GPU while saving a bit of cash.
The rest is fine, also b350 is stil good, whatever these people are saying is complete nonsense, most are probably in the PC Gaming money trap mindset, if you don't know what that is I suggest you search it up.
The only Problem with b350 is that you will need to BIOS update the board first because the micro code isn't updated for raven ridge on that chipset.
Other then that your good to go.
Here is an example pairing if you decide to get a midrange GPU with a R3 2200g (This guy has a b350 and supposedly people are suggesting a b450 which is more expensive, nerve on some people when PC gaming is supposed to be cheap)
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/16718046
Gigabyte B450 Aorus M then.
Screw those, they put more money in marketing than in actual hardware.
What's the in-game difference between those 2? If it's just like <10fps, maybe I'll go for 2200g.
What about MSI B450 Tomahawk? The price is nearly same.
Also as a note, I think I need a motherboard with longer lifetime since it's kinda lazy to upgrade the motherboard. The ryzen has an oc feature (thats its speciality), so I might wanna try to oc the memory and maybe the cpu itself one day (I'm gonna play with the stock settings for a few months), that's what I mean by I need a motherboard with a longer lifetime.
Some reviews said that MSI B450 Tomahawk is good for ryzen cpus, and also some reviews said that gigabyte b450 motherboards have such bad vrms, I don't even know if that's real, so just to anticipate future problems.
Very happy with this chip, system.
my specs:
Ryzen 5 2400g
gigabyte ab 350-gaming
16gb corsair vengeance led 3200mhz
intel optane 512 gb m2 (sale priced)
600 watt coolermaster psu
The Ryzen 5 will play any game I have tried.
Most motherboards are now AMD Ryzen 2000 ready.
upgraded to latest bios to support high speed ram.
I would recommend you get the fastest, low latency ram you can find.
The GPU side on chip likes high speed ram.
You can start with 8gb and add more later.
Since GPU will use 2gb of system ram.
my system plays Fortnite on low 1080p around 50-70 fps
I play COD BO4 at 1080p low settings 60% resolution and get 55-85 fps.
Great starter build with lots of upgrade potential!