Worth upgrading to RTX 2080TI for ray tracing at max settings 2560x1440?

[SHREDDER]

My pc now is:
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS PRIME X370 PRO
CPU: RYZEN 7 1700
RAM: 16 GB DDR4 3200MHZCL15 GS KILL RIP JAWS
GPU: GTX 970 G1 GAMING
MONITOR: DELLP2416D 24'' 2560X1440 60 HZ IPS
PSU: CORSAIR 750 WATT
HDD1: WD BLACK 4 TB
HDD2: 1 TB
I have wathced all ray traced videos on youtube and it seems like lighting and shadows are enough better compared to how they are on all no ray tracing cards. And since weeks ago from what i read battlefield 1 which is currently the only game to support raytracing became playble at 2560x1440 max settings with RTX 2080 TI and we have more coming like metro exodus atomic heart control e.t.c. But since it is very expensive(most cheap iin my country is the Palit RTX 2080TI for 1250 euros) will it be worth to wait for AMD and Intel to release their ray tracing graphics card at a cheaper price or will it take so long? I already upgraded in 2017(cpu ram motherboard and hdd) and also in 2016(monitor and psu) so upgrading again now seems crazy but anyway what should i do?

[Autumn_]

Messaggio originale di SHREDDER:

I dont care about 144 fps i have never bought a 144 hz monitor and will never buy one. With or without bottleneck it will still 60 fps on max settings 1440p and 4k on evrything so i bottleneck will be something that i will not understand as it will still running 60 fps on evrything at max settings.

144hz is one of the best things to ever come to the PC market.
If you've ever tried a 120-144hz monitor, then you will never use 60hz again.
And, chances are you will buy one sooner or later, since it's the way all monitors are going to go.

[SHREDDER]

My mext monitor will be 8k 60 hz not 4k 144 hz. I will wait until prices drop on 8k monitors. Let see... I can buy RTX 2080 TI now or wait until september for RTX 3000.... Since gtx 970 has lasted so long and still runs evrything at max serttings 1440p i believe it wont be a problem keeping it for a few more months.

[Monk]

You have to be trolling at this point, or atleast I hope you are.

Low fps is not running at max settings in anyone's eyes but yours, running at max settings suggests a good and playable frame rate.

8k for a monitor is pointless.

If you aren't trolling, just go for a 2080, you'll get the same performance on your system.

[Waldherz]

Messaggio originale di ugafan:

i would say no, it's not worth it.

1. you only have a 60hz monitor.
2. 1700 will hold the 2080 ti back somewhat.
3. how many games will actually utilize ray tracing?

Nah it wont. Depending on the games ofc

[Monk]

Messaggio originale di Waldherz彡:

Messaggio originale di ugafan:

i would say no, it's not worth it.

1. you only have a 60hz monitor.
2. 1700 will hold the 2080 ti back somewhat.
3. how many games will actually utilize ray tracing?

Nah it wont. Depending on the games ofc

Id love to see evidence to back up your claim, as every review and personal experience says otherwise.

[EliteGamer]

Yep, 144hz is amazing. I’ve just bought an Asus ROG PG279Q 1440p 165hz monitor in the sale.... I’m going to do a video review of it against my other monitors, XB271HK and PG248Q and see how it “stacks” up against them.

As for upgrading to a 2080 Ti, I wouldn’t bother. It’s not a value for money GPU. A 1070 Ti would be a nice upgrade over a 970.

[wenken [ITA]]

I don't think so. I would wait till the release something better and Nvidia stops beign a ♥♥♥♥.
atm I would go AMD just because Nvidia and Intel are becoming like Apple.
RT is only supported in one game atm, and believe me, 144 fps at 1440p maxed out is better than 60 fps 1440p with RT. While playing you'll barely notice cause anybody focuses on ponds while playing a FPS. it's and it's just a marketing thing.