Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1. If the kits are too different, it may cause stability issues. In cases that it works, the lowest speed and highest latency apply across all sticks, if I remember correctly. For example, if the 2x4 kit is DDR4-2400 CL14 while the 2x8 kit is DDR4-3000 CL15, all sticks will run at DDR4-2400 CL15.
2. Do research on your motherboard. Some motherboards have issues when all 4 RAM slots are populated, especially true with Ryzen Threadripper at launch. Also be sure to populate the slots according to what the manual requires to use dual-channel. For example, having the 4GB sticks in the first and third slot, and the 8GB sticks in the second and fourth slot. Usually thats how dual channel is on most boards, but I do recall that a few out there have it set up so it went A1/A2/B1/B2 instead of the typical A1/B1/A2/B2.
and this ^
why sell the RAM when he can use it?
Thats typical Asus naming while other brands espacially Gigabyte uses Intel naming like that:
DIMM_4 - DIMM_2 - DIMM_3 - DIMM_1
Moth TR board btw. have 8 slots but so far correct.
Yeah, I forgot that X399 boards usually have 8 slots, not 4. I just remembered that TR4 boards had a common issue with all 8 populated when the first generation released.
It does as cache beside the obvios fact that Ram gets more expensive by the day and Ram utilization rises constantly too. And there multiple games that can utilize more then 16 GB RAM.
If the kits are too different 1 of the kits may only show as Single Channel instead of Dual Channel
This is highly probable with that kind of mixing
Unless you SPECIFICALLY need 24GB, 16GB is plenty in 99% of cases
Kit differences have nothing to do with single vs dual channel. It depends solely on if the slots are properly populated.
I beg to differ considering i'm having that same exact problem with my 4x4GB kit because 1 Kit is newer than the other even though they are the same kit(technically the same but not the same now that i read the info again)
The newer kit shows up as Single Channel on CPU-Z
-
Unless "Ranks" means which side the RAM chip is on
Memory tab actually does show Dual Channel
So nevermind my previous
Then you must have messed up somewhere along the way, because if all four slots are populated, it should be running in dual channel. People run 24 GB in dual channel no problem.
If you're referring to ranks, that's not what it means. Channel # is what you should be looking at.
There's no benefit to more cache with such usage, certainly not to the value of 2x4GB of DDR3 (*) on the secondhand market(&).
New DDR4, yes. Old, secondhand DDR3, not so much.
* I'm assuming it's DDR3 based on the fact he got 2x4, while 2x8 was already pretty common at the start of the DDR4 era.
& I said the price drops daily, not that it's already valueless.
2x8 is not only enough, but safer because of incompatibility between kits and differing RAM.
Nothing wrong with using both kits, but it's not beneficial and could produce errors.