Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
토론 규칙 및 지침
게시글 신고
You have no idea what you talking of, do you?
Liquid cooling is not quiter. How to you cool the liquid? With fans... Just that the loudest part is the pump...
Also liquid doesn't keep you PC colder as the cooling performance is the same as with tower coolers with exceptions of large AIO (360) or custom loops as you have a larger bearding size when using large or multiple radiators.
Liquid is not more of a risk. When it is an AIO you have to mishandle it t OK make it leak and in case of a custom loop you test it befor actually running the entire PC. If it doesn't leak there, it won't leak later aswell.
A simple reply for this.
You.
Are.
Wrong.
Which part? First or second? Or both? How about this, if you spend 800 dollars on a CPU, don't buy the 30 dollar cooler. Even if I'm positive it would work without throttling at bone stock speeds and a good airflow case. It won't turbo up to 5.1 for very long, if at all. You'll probably have temps up in the high 80's but that's still under thermal throttle temps. It's probably comparable to an overclocked 8700k as far as heat generation goes. I can't find anyone who was silly enough to test it on youtube or anything, but I'd put 5 bucks that it'll work for gaming and regular office use. If you need to render or stream then probably not though.
As for the value, that's questionable and can only be appreciated on a case by case basis, as for other options doing it for hundreds less, again, questionable at best, for hundreds less that pretty much means the 2700x, which, is an amazing chip, but, it is also considerably slower in all tasks in comparison, what value that holds is personal mind you.
There is the first gen threadrippers to consider, which, when it comes to raw cores, will win out, but if the job requires speed will get spanked, TR also requires expensive Motherboards (not that you should put a 9900k on a cheap board, but, there are options).
Point is, you can't really run the cpu properly on anything shy of high end cooling solutions and there isn't really a cheaper option which matches its performance in tasks it is capable of, as being slower, isn't doing the same job.
It is a very niche product, and honestly hard to suggest as it comes at a premium, and for gaming, it is overkill.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1577366696
I think earlier in the thread, OP said it would be for gaming, some streaming and possibly some rendering. You're right, the value here is going to be an individual assessment. I was wrong in saying it was not a good value. I should have said "in my opinion, the extra money isn't worth the performance you will gain". A 212 certainly wouldn't be ideal, in fact I think it's just about the smallest/cheapest you could use at bone stock without throttling. And I'm assuming that the motherboard doesn't have any sneaky turbo nonsense on by default, as most of them do. To get the most from this chip you're really going to want some really nice cooling. I think the original post was because OP was ordering from a system builder who had very limited options for cooling (which is odd considering they're selling such high end chips).
https://www.trustedreviews.com/guide/best-cpu-coolers
It seems to perform as well as liquid coolers and comes with less risk of anything going wrong, like pumps breaking or leaking and having something as simple as a fan is much easier for somebody as tech inept as me to keep working fine.
This model is enough for a stock i9 9900k right? keeping in mind my room can get VERY warm during summer (around 35c was peak this summer, maybe even higher at some points)
If not I will just go with i7 8700k but what is all the talk I have seen about hyperthreading only been on i9?
I guess I also now need to find a UK store that will build a pc with that cooler and within my budget.
Should stay below 70c. Which is perfectly fine, and considering it's such a hot chip.
I'm also from the UK, and yeah, the heat was a ♥♥♥♥♥ this year. But if the weather is like that again, it won't really be a problem, the cooler could handle it. Worst case, you turn your fans up higher.
And, every i7 up to 9th gen had hyperthreading. Then they dropped it (For seccurity reasons iirc.)
So the i7-8700k will have hyperthreading, 6 cores 12 threads.
Its because of the radiator size you have therefor you have a way higher TDP and can run fans slower for the same temperature.
The same rpm can be achieved in tower coolers too if you do t overclock. So in the end they not more silent, they just have a higher cooling performance which either can be used to keep the hardware colder or reduce the fan speed.
As general Statement that liquid custom loops are used for more silence is wrong. They can be used as explained above for it due to the fact of a higher TDP removal.