安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Why should they parked all the time when you look into Taskmanager?
Install your Chipset Drivers and you won't have any issues.
It isn't a big issue as the CPU only uses what it has to use but it's just something that I am not used to and I guess it is the norm with WIndows 10. Although apparently you can change the registry so it matches WIndows 7 but I am not that bothered as I think the parking cores thing makes little to 0 difference to anything.
do you know what parking a core actually means? You cant see it in a task manager, you couldnt even do that in windows 7.
Obviously none of you know what you are talking about.
In Windows 10 home which I have, all of the cores are unparked and after some research quite a few people have reported the same, (it may differ with different windows versions).
Anyway the parked/unparked cores and monitor in windows is pretty basic stuff, I am surprised these guys have no clue about it lol. I am using Intel and you are using Ryzen @tacoshy so it isn't just on intel.
Windows 10 is desgined for mobile hardware as smartphone and tablets in mind aswell. So it is heavy supporting multicore/thread. That is also why it will not park those core by default as it not relays on singlecore performance. It overall gets a better performance and les spwoer suage when using all cores lightly instead of pushing all load on a single core.
However I never recognized the parked text on windows 7. that is new to me but I also dont know everything. On the other hand I'm also an overcloekr who pushes the CPU always at its limit disabling c-states by default.
It's cool, I just never really noticed any difference in games when Win7 used to automatically park and unpark cores and when I used to just set them all to unpark whilst gaming I don't think it made any difference again. Yet if I set the affinity of the cores in for example.. under a game's process and parked a few of the cores then the game would just start to fart lol.
From my experience unless I am mistaken.. Window's taking charge of the parking and unparking of the cores makes no difference to how the cores are being used as they seem to act like they are parked anyway even when they are all forced to be unparked. But that's just what I have noticed. THe only difference I see is the power saving I guess which I would imagine is minimal when all are unparked. I am too tired to think any more about it now.
Yes you could.
On my laptop if I set power plan to balanced (or anything below highest) it will show Parked in taskman for at least half of cores regularly.
plenty on that in goolgle too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRFCb5Ydeu8
here even you can see the picture.
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-2686673/disable-cpu-core-parking.html
I don't think anyone has stated that is is big concern at all. The conversation immediately turned into a debate of who was right and who was wrong about something unrelated to my original post. I just wondered why my version of Windows 10 didn't park the cores like Windows 7 did when they were not in use, it's a power saving feature but not a big concern, thanks for your big concern though ;)
Like I said, install your Motherboard Chipset Drivers.
Balanced fixes it