安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
well it's vega 64 which has 300W TDP and Strix has only 2x8pin power connectors. Vega 56 has 210W TDP so I don't think it has the same problem
TDP =/= power requirements
TDP = avg. heat producing in stock settings
Despite that, 8 pin can delievr 150W and the PCI-E Slot 75W. So 2x8 Pin = 375W Power delivers (NOT!!! TDP)
Heat in electrical components is the result of the power consumed by said components. When a manufacturer states a TDP for their component, it is the power being consumed for said component and the associated cooling solution that needs to dissipate that heat generated by that component. The heat generated depends on the Watts consumed and the time it's consuming it. That results in Joules (thermal energy). Once you know the Joules, you can then size the solution for cooling said component.
So, if you don't want to overclock, go with the vega56 to make use of freesync, as performance will be close, if you are happy to OC the 1070ti is considerably faster.
Vega56 is only +9% over 1070.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1070-Ti-vs-AMD-RX-Vega-56/3943vs3938
And 1070 Ti is +9% over vega56.
Neither are really an upgrade much at all.
A better course of action would be to try and grab a RTX 2080 here in a couple days. They're being released to the public for sale in literally 2 days.
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1070-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1070-Ti/3609vs3943
In fact 1070 Ti is only +19% over your original 1070... I doubt you would even notice a single +1 FPS in any game from that.