What's your Cinebench Score?

[The Chicagoan]

I have the intel i7 4790K overclocked to 4.65 GHz at 1.31 volts.

Score:

927

[Malygos]

Messaggio originale di tacoshy:

1479 with i7-7700K @5.4 GHz
2304 with i7-8720X @5.1 GHz

but also only after clean boot. Both with 4x16GB DDR4-3200 CL14 RAM in Dual or Quad Channel on Top End Motherboards.

You managed to get the same score as people with liquid nitrogen and almost at 7ghz at 5.4? http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r15/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_5271&cores=4#start=60#interval=20

[tacoshy]

look into the list - you will realize that the cinebench score dow not relay soley on the CPu nor on the clock. you find lower clocked scores having a much higher score then higher clocked scores. Cinebench is a rendering process which not only mainly needs cores espacially weak cores but good RAm support. Pretty much nobody uses high RAM amount during LN" because you kill your hardware with all the water. Thats why most ppl even sue cheaper motherboard and literally sink them in petroleum jelly to extend the time until water finds a way to shorten the motherboard and killing the entire hardware.

PS: there is a guy on #338 with 6GHz overclock abrely pulling 1065 CB rating. So you with 5.1GHz on your own should not be able to reach that either then even clsoely with your logic.

PPS: and #239 makes it to 1064 CB rating with mere 2.9GHz should be impossibel then too? onlly 1 CB less with less then half of the OC?

-cinebench is not an easy calculation soley out of your CPU + Clockspeed.

[Malygos]

Messaggio originale di tacoshy:

look into the list - you will realize that the cinebench score dow not relay soley on the CPu nor on the clock. you find lower clocked scores having a much higher score then higher clocked scores. Cinebench is a rendering process which not only mainly needs cores espacially weak cores but good RAm support. Pretty much nobody uses high RAM amount during LN" because you kill your hardware with all the water. Thats why most ppl even sue cheaper motherboard and literally sink them in petroleum jelly to extend the time until water finds a way to shorten the motherboard and killing the entire hardware.

PS: there is a guy on #338 with 6GHz overclock abrely pulling 1065 CB rating. So you with 5.1GHz on your own should not be able to reach that either then even clsoely with your logic.

PPS: and #239 makes it to 1064 CB rating with mere 2.9GHz should be impossibel then too? onlly 1 CB less with less then half of the OC?

-cinebench is not an easy calculation soley out of your CPU + Clockspeed.

Quad channel doesnt add 300 points to a cinebench score nice try lmao my 8600k has 64gb quad and wow 2 glitches result when every other one at your speed is nowhere near those numbers??? By all means post up a verified list on there people will be commenting so much youll delete your email willing to pay $1000+ for that cpu ill be waiting for that and the pubg video at the same time

[tacoshy]

it not only 2 rating - they are all over the place. while same rating have only on the verfied list more then 500 Mhz difference in clock speed regularitly. Liek I said it is all about rednering capabilities and they not come soley on the CPU. Just do the renderign stuff with 2 different motherboards. even plenty videos about it on youtube already giving huge differences.

Also do mutliple benches at different speeds on your own. For me it is often that at a higher clcok I often not get higher score but less. Also wehn doing the test after a time and not right at the beginning after a fresh boot I lose also around 150-200 points. Same for RAm. Plenty intresting test and results on the web.

And as side note the biggest gain to raise the rating is OC'ing not the CPU but the RAM cache clock.

[Malygos]

Messaggio originale di tacoshy:

it not only 2 rating - they are all over the place. while same rating have only on the verfied list more then 500 Mhz difference in clock speed regularitly. Liek I said it is all about rednering capabilities and they not come soley on the CPU. Just do the renderign stuff with 2 different motherboards. even plenty videos about it on youtube already giving huge differences.

Also do mutliple benches at different speeds on your own. For me it is often that at a higher clcok I often not get higher score but less. Also wehn doing the test after a time and not right at the beginning after a fresh boot I lose also around 150-200 points. Same for RAm. Plenty intresting test and results on the web.

And as side note the biggest gain to raise the rating is OC'ing not the CPU but the RAM cache clock.

Its 2 ratings other wise it comes down to small tweaks out doing eachother extra ram doesnt add anything near that much my 8600k at 5.3 cant score that high an 8700k with turbo boost scores a little over 1400 at most ram would bounce up to 1250 at over 4,000mhz with still low timings. Like i said might as well post yours on there pros will be knocking your door in for that magic when they see the score

[Monk]

Messing on main rig briefly so ran my actual numbers, 7900x @ 4.8 multi 2668 single 211.

[Bad 💀 Motha]

First off, there are two scores, why not share both.

Single Core
Multi-Core

Click File > Advanced

Then un-tick OpenGL and do both CPU tests, each have their own score, and for obvious reasons. Then to easily test both, click File again and click on Run Selected Tests; as you will have a check box for running both CPU test types (Single and Multi core)

A strong multi-thread/core result doesn't make it the always better CPU over others. Look at AMD FM2/AM3; heck even many on AM4; they can do very well for most part in Multi-Core performances, but generally can't touch Intel in Single Core.

We still, all of us, use alot of things and do alot of tasks that really benefit from a very strong Single-Core performance.

Messaggio originale di Cloudy Canadian:

Messaggio originale di The Chicagoan:

I got the same issue. I can't push past 4.6 GHz because I have a 120 rad. I got up to 4.9 GHz but in Cinebench it thermal throttled because I was above 100 C.

Above 100ºC? I start sweating nervously if I go above 85ºC, oh well, around 4.7GHz is more than enough for normal use in this day and age.

Yes, seriously, monitor CPU/GPU Temps and also because many testing apps are so stressful, your monitoring software might actually lose focus and not update fast enough. Before I run such tests I go into Task Manager and set Task Manager to Priority > Realtime. Then do the same for what Monitoring app I'm using, like say OpenHardwareMonitor for example; just for when doing stressful testing; this way the monitoring apps shouldn't lose focus do to the benchmarks being so stressful on the system during time of testing.

If you see your CPU peak @ 90*C+ I'd play it safe and manually click to stop whatever stress tests your doing, as the cooling is obviously lacking and it's not worth possible damages to your hardware.