Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
But please also understand, it's not just your CPU Cooler, you ambient room temp and your overall Case Airflow will play a big role in all of this. The biggest thing folks tend to overlook is Case Airflow, and having a lack of case fans providing proper or more than enough, airflow wise. If a Case has a fan placement, fill it... with maybe the exception of a side panel that has placements, as large tower coolers get in the way of that, and side panel airflow tends to disrupt the whole mix anyways.
You should always have your ventilators "sucking up" air from the bottom and blowing it upwards (because very basic physics is that hot air rises and cold air lowers, so it's always going to be more hot at the top than at the bottom).
While that's true in theory, research has shown it doesn't make much practical difference. Theoretically, putting your radiator on the front of your case and intake through it is one of the dumbest possible case layouts. But it works just fine, and it's usually within a degree of other layouts. Assuming the case itself has decent airflow.
Actually there is not one thing wrong with doing that, why?
Because unless you have a serious thermal issue, your Rads and Tubes should never heat up.
So having a Rad in the front of the Case and using those Fans for cold air intake is perfectly fine.
what about the BK009 Pure Rock Compact ?
It's a great cooler, but it doesn't have the Surface Area for your needs. Better to go with the full-size heatsink.
i am using a calcuilator to determine how big a PSU i will need
depending on where i set my CPU voltage it ranges from 400w - 1200w
how high will i have to set a 6800k vcore in order to reach 4.9ghz
I honestly can't say. All CPUs are slightly different, all 8600Ks will run a slightly different vCore. You'll probably be below 1.40v but it really depends on your specific 8600K and how it performs. My 8700K is way below that, but it's a really nice one.
vCore doesn't effect the PSU in any meaningful way, so I would put that calculator aside. Your PSU demand comes more from your choice of GPU, for a single GPU build I'd recommend around a 600-650W model. And for dual GPUs I'd go with 900ish. Just for maximum safety and overkill.
I have an 8700K that I normally run at 4.9 and it's very happily running off a 760W Corsair AX760i. Corsair AX would be my first recommendation for a PSU, they're ridiculously overbuilt. Perfect for overclocking. And they're rated for over ten years of hard service.
And finally - why an 8600K? Hyperthreading makes a huge performance difference in a lot of games, and don't really make the 8700K run any hotter. If you're gonna spend the money on an OC build, why not go with the more feted CPU?
Usually you need around 1.35-1.38 to reach 5Ghz in an mediocore chip.
You can always consider delidding if you want to reduce your tempratures further.
And may reduce the voltage required a bit.
um
i dont think an i5 8th gen is a mediocre chip!
I know de-lidding has a terrible reputation, but it's pretty safe thanks to modern tools. A Rockit-88 makes it virtually idiotproof, and even re-assembles the CPU for you afterwoulds. I've done it myself, it makes a huge difference for Gen8 CPUs and it's really something anybody can do now. It's just a little messy, Liquid Ultra loves to spurt everywhere.
That's not what she means. What she means is, a normal 8600K needs about 1.35v for that CPU clock. A bad 8600K might need 1.4v. And a really good one might need 1.3v.
CPUs are idiosyncratic and rarely match Blueprint. So you'll find a huge range of vCores for a given overclock.
I would say it's absolutely doable. Gen 8 have a couple of minor improvements over Gen 7, even a subpar 8700K should handle 5.0 GHz comfortably. I've never heard of one that couldn't. The trade-off for that is even more heat, de-lidding is almost obligatorty for overclocked Gen 8s.
I think, delidding is most stupid thing which anyone could do with his CPU if he plans to use itfor s long time.