安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
此主题已被锁定 
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
The PS4 and Xbox One both use AMD Jaguar-based APUs. They are relatives to some older Athlon and Sempron CPUs/APUs. If Sony/Microsoft allowed us we could install Windows on these things.
The Xbox One is already running a Windows 10 based OS now that I think of it..
as i said above a smartphone is a computer^^, its size, capabilities, (price doesnt have to due with it?) is feasible for individual use "
scientifically, this would mean a lot of things are considered PCs, including macs and smartphones
socially only windows computers are considered PCs
all smartphones are just a convenient small, less powerful version of a desktop computer
lolwhat smartphone progress is not slow
phones are having mechanical pop-up cameras for more screen this year
new sensors were added to phones this and last year (retina scan sensor, face scan sensor)
new types of displays were made
arbitrary code can only run on a x86 processor, if you replace the processor the x86 processor with something that isnt x86, its still a PC
on smartphones the OS is linux-based, at least for the andriod OS
mobile devices are not intended to run the DESKTOP operating systems, because they do not have x86 processors
to support multiple boot drives you need more than one drive, which most smartphones do not have
the ability to reinstall the OS is there, just not as conviently
requires a desktop or a laptop of some kind that can download files
control have hardware sounds a lot like mini-ITX desktops, you are limited to what you can put in there because of the design (the size)
they arent very different from feature phones by their HARDWARE, their POWER and techonology is what makes them superior, and what stands out from feature phones
like comparing a 2006 desktop to a 2017 one, they arent that different in terms of hardware, but that hardware has evolved to make even more powerful desktop
this is why i call it a social aspect when you call windows desktops PCs, every time someone says "i have a PC" you think of windows, every time someone says "i have a mac", you think of macos, every time someone thinks of "i have a linux", you think of linux
when in fact every each and one of those are all PCs
CPU tech advances quite slowly, Intel's CPU architecture has barely changed over the last ten years,. My 3770K can match a 7700K easily, with the mildest of overclocks. Even when compared to the 8700K, it performs extremely well and gets very close on FPS.
Ordinarily I wojuld say an Intel K-Series can easily last 5-10 years. The only things preventing me saying that straight-up are AMD and the Graphene Mass-Extinction.
AMD's Infinity Framework performs really well at small sizes. A stock R7 2700 will match a stock 8700K in most scenarios, and the tech has plenty f power and plenty of shrinkage left ahead. Late generation Ryzen might be a threat. depending on how well they overclock.
And then years from now you have Graphene technology. Graphene is a Carbon allotrope with amazing conductive properties, and it's going to absolutely revolutionize CPU design. We're many years away from graphene based CPUs, but it may overlap with the end of the 8700K's effective lifespan. I fully expect Graphene will mean a mass-extinction of ALL copper-based CPUs. Copper would never compete with a working Graphene design.
Que pasa?
I would say that's a conservative estimate. We're close to the limit of what a Copper CPU can do, there isn't much potential to make a faster CPU. And for that reason, 8700Ks will probably still be around when Graphene obsoletes their entire design concept. Probably in the 2030s.
For my two cents, I completely changed my approach with my 8700K build. Normally I would build with a planned lifespan, and design in maybe one upgrade. With my 8700K build, it's not designed to ever be replaced. It's designed to keep upgrading until it need a complete rebuild, at which point it'll be replacedm probably after 2025. Hopefully with something Graphene based.
Thank you captain obvious. We all thought Windows phone always rocked... NOT. It was an EXAMPLE.
Yes, the processor a device uses does dictate whether it's a phone or not. What do you think when you hear 5 inches and Qualcomm / Adreno? They're primarily multi-purpose phone chips.
...and what the hell does having your so called "control" got anything to do with this? I call my PC my PC, it is MY freaking personal computer. Yes, there are people that watch and track what you do online, but that has NOTHING to do with changing the PC's name to a bird or a plane....
You do however annoy users with your clueless excessive nonsense in almost every thread. There ARE Snapdragon based notebooks today that come with Windows. They do almost everything an Intel or an AMD CPU does FOR THAT USAGE. Netbook usage. Now please don't come here saying pointless crap like you always do such as "BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE AVX!!", you're not understanding the capabilities and the purpose of those SOCs. Granted, an ULV Intel CPU is stronger, but those CPUs are fine for basic Chromebooks or handhelds. Besides, Qualcomm is going strong on making them more powerful day after day. They're at the point of being compared with old CPUs, which makes them suffice for browsing tasks.