Can I run Resident Evil 2 Remake on my gaming laptop?

[Smiggles]

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz

Video Card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

Video Card #2 Intel(R) HD Graphics 630

RAM 8.0 GB

[Henfor]

Sure you can. a gtx1050 and 8gb ram can run alot of 2018 titles well. be sure to use the nvidia GPU one not your CPU's one xD.

[Vince ✟]

There's a remake?

[Henfor]

Originally posted by Vince:

There's a remake?

Yeah. i'm not into Resident Evil but it looks good.

[SenMithrarin85]

Originally posted by Obunga:

Sure you can. a gtx1050 and 8gb ram can run alot of 2018 titles well. be sure to use the nvidia GPU one not your CPU's one xD.

1050, 2018 and "run well" does not compute. If you have low standards with regards to resolution and framerate, then maybe.

[Sapph]

Originally posted by SenMithrarin85:

Originally posted by Obunga:

Sure you can. a gtx1050 and 8gb ram can run alot of 2018 titles well. be sure to use the nvidia GPU one not your CPU's one xD.

1050, 2018 and "run well" does not compute. If you have low standards with regards to resolution and framerate, then maybe.

You're underestimating 1050's performance quite a bit.
It can easily run 1080p and get 60fps. And you don't even need to put graphics to the lowest.

[Henfor]

Originally posted by SenMithrarin85:

Originally posted by Obunga:

Sure you can. a gtx1050 and 8gb ram can run alot of 2018 titles well. be sure to use the nvidia GPU one not your CPU's one xD.

1050, 2018 and "run well" does not compute. If you have low standards with regards to resolution and framerate, then maybe.

My standards are 1080p and 60fps. i don't got the money for the fancy 4k things. i myself only got a gtx960. those maybe are low standards for you. his question was if he can run the game not play it on very high settings. i answered the question with "Sure you can. a gtx1050 can run 2018 titles well." never mentioned on very high settings. if he said "can i run resident evil 2 remake on ultra settings?" i would've said something else.

[SenMithrarin85]

Originally posted by Sapph:

Originally posted by SenMithrarin85:

1050, 2018 and "run well" does not compute. If you have low standards with regards to resolution and framerate, then maybe.

You're underestimating 1050's performance quite a bit.
It can easily run 1080p and get 60fps. And you don't even need to put graphics to the lowest.

I have games like deus ex mankind divided, rise of the tomb raider for example and both of them *just* stay above 60 and thats not even with max settings. thats 1080p on a 1080...

ff15 another example, nier automata, every ubisoft game in the last year.

Whilst I'm sure there are some titles that will be well optimised enough for a 1050, it won't be a large number.

[Sapph]

Originally posted by SenMithrarin85:

Originally posted by Sapph:

You're underestimating 1050's performance quite a bit.
It can easily run 1080p and get 60fps. And you don't even need to put graphics to the lowest.

I have games like deus ex mankind divided, rise of the tomb raider for example and both of them *just* stay above 60 and thats not even with max settings. thats 1080p on a 1080...

ff15 another example, nier automata, every ubisoft game in the last year.

Whilst I'm sure there are some titles that will be well optimised enough for a 1050, it won't be a large number.

Not even max settings, but surely quite close to it.
Settings are there to be tweaked to get the performance you want.

Just drop the settings enough and it will run:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k3X8cU4Dxo

Here the card is getting 40 to 50fps at High settings. Drop some to medium and you have stable 60.

[Werecat101]

Ok lets put it this way its a 1050(mobile), so its slightly lower performance than a GTX670, its main advantage over the GTX670 is that it has faster memory, overall I disagree with people calling it a gaming card, but even saying that its a good budget GPU and will play less demanding games at very acceptable settings.

[GreenMan36]

Depends, gtx 1050 and gtx 1050m for mobile are different cards and the m variant performs 50% of the normal card.
Prepare for 900p and allot set to low.
I have the same setup on my lenovo legion y520.
The biggest bottleneck is the 2gb vram so textures on low and shadercaching needs to be tested.

[Cathulhu]

50% slower than the desktop version? That's male cow excrement:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Mobile/3650vsm211022

And for that crap did you necro this thread?

[GOD RAYS ON ULTRA™]

Gtx 1050 runs all games perfectly. The members on here saying it doesn't have probably never used one.

Also, the notebook variant is not an "M" series gpu. It's a full-blown desktop model with slightly lower TDP. The performance is nearly identical.

The GeForce 1050 is absolutely amazing! You don't even need a good PSU because they run without a 6-pin!!!

I used to have the measly 2gb version in my desktop and it ran everything on medium and sometimes high 50-60 fps solid and 1080p.

[Ralf]

Originally posted by DudeSau©e™:

Gtx 1050 runs all games perfectly. The members on here saying it doesn't have probably never used one.

In that case people here who say that GTX1060/RX580 starts to show it's age in 1080p(and you need GTX1070 minimum) are full of crap, because clearly even a half as strong GTX1050 is enough.

[Werecat101]

Originally posted by DudeSau©e™:

Gtx 1050 runs all games perfectly. The members on here saying it doesn't have probably never used one.

Also, the notebook variant is not an "M" series gpu. It's a full-blown desktop model with slightly lower TDP. The performance is nearly identical.

The GeForce 1050 is absolutely amazing! You don't even need a good PSU because they run without a 6-pin!!!

I used to have the measly 2gb version in my desktop and it ran everything on medium and sometimes high 50-60 fps solid and 1080p.

the total speed difference between a GTX1050 and a GTX1050 mobile is 17% the mobile is 17% slower overall when they dropped the power the dropped several layers of performance

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Mobile/3650vsm211022

and whilst it can play most games at medium settings its definitely a case of reduce the settings until the GTX1050 will run the game in a playable manner. The big problem is that the GTX670 is rapidly becoming the minimum GPU for new games and since the GTX670 is 16% faster than a GTX1050, Buying a GTX1050 is buying a redundant underpowered GPU!.

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-vs-Nvidia-GTX-670/3650vs2181

and yes you are correct I have never owned a GTX1050 because the GTX670 that was my old GPU is faster than the GTX1050 by a fairly big margin.

personally my upgrade path rule is always 50% or faster or dont bother.

hence I went from the GTX670 to a GTX1070 and then to a GTX1080TI.

[GreenMan36]

Originally posted by Cathulhu:

50% slower than the desktop version? That's male cow excrement:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Mobile/3650vsm211022

And for that crap did you necro this thread?

If you actually own a card, the regular 2gb version runs 50% the speed in most games.
Userbenchmark is off from the real world experience since the biggest bottleneck is the vram.

This is from my personal experience and i am sure others can confirm this statement too.

And i would appreciate if you wouldn't go so low with that offencive language.