Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
240mm is of course optimal. Anything bigger will mostly be wasted potential.
A 240 will do a better job than the stock cooler in most cases, a 360 would be better.
The old rule of a 120mm rad for each component and double that for overclocking still works, but with pascal performing better the cooler you get it (albeit not by much), there is no overkill really.
Though, budget should be heavily considered, go to mad and you would be better off selling the 1080 and getting a 1080ti under air instead as it would be cheaper and faster as watercooling gets very expensive, very fast.
Cases are extremely important for liquid cooling, you need enough space for your radiator and with the Kraken that bracket needs to fall within easy reach 0of the inlet and output tubes. Neither of those cases is a good fit.
I would recommend Phanteks for liquid cooling, failing that BeQuiet. They both offer very good Liquid Cooling support. They'd be a lot easier to work with, and both brands easily outdo Corsair and Cooler Master for build quality
I would've spent the money upgrading the CPU's cooling instead. That's where the gains are going to be, from my experience Pascal leaves little room for improvement.
I should say, as a disclaimer, my experience of Pascal overclocking comes from a slightly odd card. I have an Asus Strix O8G, a briefly-produced version of the 1080 with a major overclock. And I've had very little success improving on that, Asus seems to have found the limit of the early-production 1080 and pegged the O8G right on it.
Extra cooling might help a little, but Direct Cu-III is already the best air cooler on the market and I'm not sure how much you'd gain from it.
Funny you say that, I finished leak testing my EK Supremacy kit this morning. It's been a pleasure to work with, now I've actually got the concentration and spare time to create a working loop with it.
Funny thing about radiators; bigger radiators can actually perform worse.
Rads built around 120mm fans usually outperform 140 based models. 120s are very good at forcing air through the radiator core, which makes the system much more efficient. 140s are good at pushing air through a case, but they don't handle high pressure tasks very well. You tend to get hot-air pooling inside the core, and that means higher temps.
TLDR: A 240 usually beats a 280. Small is beautiful. Fast fans are ideal.
Any temps lower yield with diminishing returns. Voltage is the true limiting factor with Pascal, not temp. Even most AIB partner air cooling solutions hold Pascal under 70c.
I recommend getting a G12 bracket with an AIO or just upping to a 1080 Ti, because the money you are willing to spend on cooling can be better spent towards a better gpu.
I know it sounds weird, but it's true. It comes down to two things.
Radiator cores produce a lot of air resistance, you have to force-feed air through the core for it to work effectively. Otherwise hot air can pool inside the core and that seriously hurts efficiency.
Larger fans generally spin slower. Most 140s are designed to be quiet rather than powerful, and don't generate enough airflow to run a radiator efficiently. High-Static Pressure 120mm fans are much louder, but they produce the kind of pressure you need. And you can buy specialized radiator fans iin that size, like the EK Vardar-120.
Larger rads actually have some major downsides. Longer rads need extra fans, which adds to costs. You also need to power them, and full-size 360 rads usually need a dedicated USB Fan Hub(worth $50+). Thicker cores need more airflow, again that means more fans. My system has a 360 by 62 millimetre LC Solutions rad, and that needs six fans and it's own fan hub.
For custom loops, bigger rads also guzzle more coolant. My complete loop needs $80 worth of coolant to fill, or two and a half bottles.
depending on the fans you use, those costs can add up VERY fast.
i baulked at the last minute on using fancy coolant (primochill vue which i still want) as just using standard clear water lets me swap colours when ever i want and the vue would of sort of made me stick to just one, that, and due to a fault on my cpu i had to drain the loop after only a week, and it would of cost £120!!!!!! to fill it (or 4 bottles lol).
Given that i want to extend my cooling by 4 more 480mm rads, i dont think ill ever get to use vue as it will just be insane to spent £200 on coolant lol.