basemark gpu benchmark

[mtono]

i just foud "Basemark GPU" benchmark software while i have been surfing. i tested my very slow gpu nvidia gt 1030. i thought before, maybe impossible to test my gfx board with this new tool.
you can test a "Vulkan" score (mine is ~14500) and an opengl score (~12500).
i think it is a good benchmark software, because they have a "Vulkan" test.
i am sorry, if i have been posting in the wrong forum.
does somebody have an interst in bechmarking, too? Basemark GPU is good in my opinion. the test is very short.
kind regards

[rezo]

I'll give it a go with my R9 280X

Got 22000 for Vulkan and 17000 on OpenCL

[mtono]

aha. vulkan is better i guess. in doom 2016 i have seen this, too. thank you for benchmarking.
kind regards

[rezo]

No problem, also im guessing you ran it at 720p medium? because I tried 4k high and I got a score of 2069 for Vulkan

[mtono]

ah. i did not tell. i ran 720p, medium.

[Monk]

k so i figured id come play to (sorry)

4k high vulkan 9491
720p medium vulkan 141031

4k high openGL 9184
720p medium openGL 44936

so i guess thats the new target ?

[mtono]

thank you. what i still wonder is: how did the 64 bit card nvidia gt 1030 so fast? i can play doom 2016(kinda sort of). you have nearly ten times my vulkan score on 720p.

[Monk]

oh, that wasnt with a GT1030 ...
if you or anyone are on a normal sensible system, disregard my scores.

thats with sli 1080ti's however, it only seems to use 1 card, and i cannot see how to buy the pro version so i can see how the test is broken down properly to see exactly what it is testing and what is affecting it, cpu seems to have no real impact (makes sense its a gpu test), same for RAM.

ive never seen or used this benchmark before so figured id join in the fun, though no real leaderboard is frustrating as it makes comparing results to d=see what might be causing wehat result difficult, one thing, i am amazed how much lower then openGL score was for me compare to you guys (percentage wise).

edited to make it actually readable.