Is Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut the best thermal paste?
... that has no risk of short circuiting the motherboard?
< >
Beiträge 115 von 29
Omega 23. März 2018 um 4:17 
MX4.. Kryonaut.. Toothpaste.. It's all more or less the same.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
MX4.. Kryonaut.. Toothpaste.. It's all more or less the same.
... apart from, you know, thermal temperatures..
Omega 23. März 2018 um 4:19 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
MX4.. Kryonaut.. Toothpaste.. It's all more or less the same.
... apart from, you know, thermal temperatures..
It's 1c difference at most. Just get any thermal paste and you will be fine.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
It's 1c difference at most. Just get any thermal paste and you will be fine.
Not according to Derbauer, who says there can be as much as 5-10c difference
Omega 23. März 2018 um 4:23 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
It's 1c difference at most. Just get any thermal paste and you will be fine.
Not according to Derbauer, who says there can be as much as 5-10c difference
He is an extreme overclocker. You are not going for 8Ghz on LN2 so the difference is minimal.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Not according to Derbauer, who says there can be as much as 5-10c difference
He is an extreme overclocker. You are not going for 8Ghz on LN2 so the difference is minimal.
You don't need to be using ln2 to see a difference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwqYh6c3Xco
Omega 23. März 2018 um 4:25 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
He is an extreme overclocker. You are not going for 8Ghz on LN2 so the difference is minimal.
You don't need to be using ln2 to see a difference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwqYh6c3Xco
That video is about liquid metal VS themal paste on a delidded cpu.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Omega; 23. März 2018 um 4:26
tacoshy 23. März 2018 um 4:53 
and it really depends on the OC between IHS and CPuU cooler. Omega has less then 1-2C difference with Liquid Metal (Thermal Grizzly COnductonaut, Kyronaut is not LM) while I have a difference of 5-6C but at 1.415V and 5.3GHz
Of course you can short things with it if you spread it onto the motherboard.

I wouldn't choose it. I would go with a basically non-conductive one. The noctua one or whatever.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Omega:
He is an extreme overclocker. You are not going for 8Ghz on LN2 so the difference is minimal.
You don't need to be using ln2 to see a difference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwqYh6c3Xco
I think the other person was talking about on the heat spreader not replacing the stuff inside.
But sure it's about replacing it there too. Maybe a thinner layer too though. The original design is like it is for safety.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Aliquis Freedom & Ethnopluralism; 23. März 2018 um 4:59
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Aliquis Freedom & Ethnopluralism:
Of course you can short things with it if you spread it onto the motherboard.

I wouldn't choose it. I would go with a basically non-conductive one. The noctua one or whatever.
Kryonaut isn't conductive, Conductonaut is.
ugafan 23. März 2018 um 5:00 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von tacoshy:
I have a difference of 5-6C but at 1.415V and 5.3GHz

you saw 5-6c difference with kryonaut? what paste are you comparing it to?
Ursprünglich geschrieben von R||||DGE RACER:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Aliquis Freedom & Ethnopluralism:
Of course you can short things with it if you spread it onto the motherboard.

I wouldn't choose it. I would go with a basically non-conductive one. The noctua one or whatever.
Kryonaut isn't conductive, Conductonaut is.
Yep and according to benchmarks and numbers kryonaut is probably has the highest thermal conductivity without being an liquid metal.
So for using on your GPU and between your CPU and cooler its the go to paste imo.
I switched from noctua to kryonaut like an year ago and difference is like max 3C but still gain is a gain.
tacoshy 23. März 2018 um 5:11 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von ugafan:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von tacoshy:
I have a difference of 5-6C but at 1.415V and 5.3GHz

you saw 5-6c difference with kryonaut? what paste are you comparing it to?

5-6C difference froh 78C down to 72C in P95 1344K After swotching from the Kyronaut to Conductonaut.
Kaihekoa 23. März 2018 um 5:22 
Yes, it's the best non-conductive TIM, but the difference is relatively small compared to cheaper high-end TIMS. It would only be noticeable on a heavily OC'd system.
Monk 23. März 2018 um 5:35 
honestly the difference between any of the high end non conductive TIM's is pretty much within margin of error or 1 or 2 degrees at best, personally i use arctic mx4 paste and thermal grizzly conductonaut for the shunts.
< >
Beiträge 115 von 29
Pro Seite: 1530 50

Geschrieben am: 23. März 2018 um 4:13
Beiträge: 29