安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/76333-i7-2600k-vs-i7-8700k-upgrading-worthwhile-8.html
You shot yourself in the foot there ^.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/76333-i7-2600k-vs-i7-8700k-upgrading-worthwhile-5.html
And there ^.
Fallout 4 I played on my old FX all cranked up at 1080p I don't see it as the end of the world\ at all.
Yes, my i5-7400 does currently bottleneck and causes a little stutter when playing GTA V or Fallout 4.
I think you're missing the point stutter and bottleneck are two very different things, if you are stuttering it is not the "bottleneck" that you're convinced you have causing it.
I don't really know what I'm talking about no. However, when I go to task manager, it show's my cpu spiking up to 100% Usage.
Not worth the expence + change-up involved; and all Ryzen are picky about RAM, period.
a 7700K is a good choice, however you must buy a cooler for that, like Hyper212-EVO.
7700K will stomp any Ryzen into the ground for pure-gaming.
If AMD pulls off a good 10-15% and being less picky about RAM with the 2000 series it would sit pretty close to the 7700k in game benchmarks with a 1080/ti.
But I know the 7700K is better for current games than 1600. As for whatever it's really a better choice vs the 2600 onwards though. I'd personally would had taken the 2600 but it's pretty irrelevant because he had already gotten a CPU I think and had decided he didn't wanted AMD I think. Then again all the same could be said for B360 and 8th gen Intel too.
If you tried to resell a B250 Motherboard you realize it wont give much profit if at all when trying tor esell it. You can get good B250 Motherboards for less then 60$ new so how much would you pay for an used one?
Sure quad core cpus have hit their limit lately but you still shouldn't be getting stutter, your cpu bottleneck should just be holding you gpu from peaking at %100.
Back to the original idea the i7 7700k with a budget 120mm HSF like the 212EVO would pop into your mobo then you'd have 4.2ghz 4 cores and 8 threads, sell off the i5 7400 for whatever you can get and call it a day.
If the OP had to do a whole CPU/MB/RAM then ya the 8700k would have been a no brainer, but the 7700k was a quick easy upgrade to get a few more years out of his rig.
B350 + Ryzen 5 1400 or 1600 is cheaper than just an i7 7700K.
Even though you buy a motherboard too.
It also have the advantage that he then can sell not only the i5 7400 but actually both the B250 and the i5 7400.
The Ryzen 5 1600 simply is cheaper. It's not necessarily better though. It's definitely worse for current games. Then again my suggestion would had been the 2600 rather than the 1600 anyway, the i5 7400 is good enough to last for some time. Or well, sticking with the 7400 is also an alternative, as is the 7700K too of course. I don't really care. I wouldn't get the 7700K new in any situation though, 8th gen + new motherboard is a better deal. He has an i5 7400 and doesn't have to buy one now. Anyway it's up for him to decide and not really my problem.