安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
The CPU is still produced... not just leftovers. I agree that it is not worth in the long run. But most ppl with budget dont care for the long runs of more then 5 years. Most ppl care for the price and a 7700K with motherboard cost less then an 8700K while they dont need the 2 cores.
And if that user says he cant even affor a 7700K just a 7700 non-K because of price the 8700K will be way otu of league
PS: if you read, I even said I would go for an 8600K...I think too that it is the better CPU but for price the 7700K is still a valid option in many cases.
Intel is going to move to 10nm with Icelake and they'll focus on that. The 8700K is 14nm and it will be obsolete by that time as well, it's had a bit of life in the past months. I don't think the 7700K is still being made, even if it is, high end boards don't come up for it anymore, so it's still an OBSOLETE platform.
It WILL be better in the cases all 6 cores are being used, not just 5 years over from now. As for price / performance, speak for yourself and stop talking about a generation older CPU being good P / P because it's based on a DEAD platform.
I do read. I said a six core would be better because of the extra cores AND the IPC, then you came up and said it's not just IPC but also the other 2 cores... sigh.
If that case, I might just found pair that's within budget. I know it is not very pretty but it is within.
i7-8700K
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117827
GIGABYTE Z370M
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813145055
GIGABYTE Z370 HD3
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813145041
I satked way ebfor if a 7700K isnt even affordable then a 8700K wont be too and he should go with 8600K (which is a 6th core coffee lake as you know)
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/11/1698293255135106538/#c1698293255135219573
8700K is already too a dead plattform even if they finally release a B360 MoBo as you already said the next generation which was planned befor coffee lake will sue a different socket. Of course this is the most modern consumer platform by Intel so dead might be the wrong way but we know that it days are coutned too.
Yes 7700K is an obsolete plattform and I agreed to it. But if you cant pay coffee lake platform or already have a LGA-1151 (v1) Board the only cost effiecient way to upgrade without raising the budget massivly. Why do ppl still upgrade on AM3+ or older Intel generations?
I dont say that 7700K will be a good choice in the long term but if you can only afford a 7700 non-K how do you want to afford the Z370 Motherboard + any decent CPU?
nice list (those boards are terrible btw. and I say it as a Gigabyte Local Vendor) but one major flaw: He needs new RAM too...
8600k, a decent z370 asus board, 8 or 16gb ram ddr4-3200
~ $600, less with 8gb.
For example
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/wQBvPs
And why is those board terrible?
Yeah. but is it DDR4?
I meant why is board that terrible? Sorry. mistaken sentence.
My Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H aren't pretty either but it is good enough for me. I was broken during college and someone damaged my old computer GA-H55-USB3. I was look for stable and quailty, boot time is not my priority. So might not all Gigabyte are that bad.
Plus, last time I heard Gigabyte were best at overclock.
What about Z370 with SSD?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsNSzSrjLgI