Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
If you don't mind TN panel than take it
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=GTX+2070&oq=GTX+2070+&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j69i60j69i61j0l2.2509j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.techpowerup.com/241995/report-nvidia-not-unveiling-2018-graphics-card-lineup-at-gdc-gtc-after-all
Or that it'll match a 1080Ti?
Nobody has a crystal ball. Planning to buy components because of what they "might" do is never a good idea.
Pascal was a massive re-design and cost billions of dollars in R&D. You can't expect to see another improvement like that this time around. All of the credible intel I've read says this coming range are tweaked/updated Pascal architecture, with modest performance gains.
AMD aren't providing strong competition and have recently lost a top GPU project lead to Intel. Intel themselves are years away from having a GPU ready for market, so Nvidia have every reason to stay quiet. Why spend another 5+ billion dollars when there's nobody around to fight?
Only old games like frikin skyrim can actually run 144hz...
Sounds like your CPU is holding you back. My regular 1080 hits 90 FPS across most games at ultra.
The same argument applies, but they did
Nope, my cpu, while old, is still great (i7-5930k).
I dont play all that many games, but probably the only recent one that i can think of, that actually runs at 144hz is Doom. In most others i get 80, maybe 100 at most.