Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Single core speed is still important otherwise how would you measure a cpus speed , fast cores no matter if you've got 1 or 16 it'll still be based on ipc per core.
BF1 DX12 really doesn't respond well to my FX8350 8 core but it plays great on DX11.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1267-battlefield-1-benchmarks/page4.html
That blows your theory to crap ^.
I'll give you DX12 improved Rise of the Tomb Raider though.
"Disable all but one core" - Dumbo, your PC will be running more then just that one single game..
Onion the A8was designed with a home user in mind who wanted to surf the net and maybe watch a Youtube video. It is not a bad chip but even when new was not designed for gaming and the games it could play had to be turned down to 720p for acceptable frame rates. Even though you bought yourself a nice little graphics card it just wont push a demanding game with that little 4 core and the slower DDR3 memory. Again not a bad chip but you might have to dial nack that resolution to get the most out of it.
I spend an entire afternoon looking at CPU usage graphs while playing KDC when troubleshooting some stability issues, back then it was eating poor core #3 for breakfast.
I also saw a MSI Afterburner log of World Of Tanks a few months ago where it was clearly only using a single core.
"As the leader of disinformation on this forum"
buddy.. I make mistakes, we all do. And I am one of the more active members, if I make a few mistakes you apparently immediately assume I am smearing crap all over the place.
Dumbo = playfull. A joke. Get a sense of humor.
Msi military class 4 or 3 it was i think, steam says pc model is MSI MS-7721 altrough it was kinda custom built so its weird how it gave my pc a name lol.
I'm not into apu's anymore as i already have dedicated gpu.
Guys this is my full cpu name-
AMD A8-7600 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
What does the 4C+6G mean, i have never understood that.
And it doesnt even reach anything close to 10 cores as this potato has only 4 of which 2 are hyperthreaded i think.
Even if you OC this CPU to death it's not going to be any good. But at least it's a cheap performance boost. Put a big CPU cooler on it and OC, case fans will not make any diference.
I tried AMD Overdrive and BIOS aswell, both times it just denied me literally.
And i'm the only user using PC meaning i'm the main administrator over it so shouldn't be a problem.
What ppl miss every time with FM2 is that there is no L3 cache and that cripples amd cpus heavily.
Cores, GHZ, instructions/architecture all matter together.
Like someone already pointed out take a look at the i5 8400 higher ipc/lower ghz/only 6 core/threads vs the Ryzen 1600 6 core 12 thread.
The a8 7600 is basically an Athlon and if OP went with an FX6350/8350 originally he'd be gaming just fine, so, anything is basically going to be better than the a8 7600.
Ps, sure FX 8 core is still managing newer games but its' ipc hurts it. Would I take a new 4 core now, no, 4 core is the new budget cpu for a reason but is the new 4 core better than a crapass FM2 sure and by a lot..