Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Even the cheapest CPUs you can buy now are dual cores with HT and quad cores. TF2 will run a lot better on a multi core CPU, not only because they have more cores but also because the single core performance of these modern CPUs is massively better.
If you are looking to buy a basic gaming PC look at the Intel 8000 series and AMD Ryzen 2000 series on the CPU front and at the Nvidia GTX 1050 ti or better for a GPU.
When on a ultra-low budget a Ryzen APU such as the 2200g and 2400g are also more then capable of running most games without a dedicated GPU.
And of course combine all this with at least 8gb of RAM and don't skimp on a quality PSU and mobo to save a few bucks.
One Intel CPU: https://ark.intel.com/products/78476/Intel-Atom-Processor-E3815-512K-Cache-1_46-GHz
...and many pre-Zen AMD models like A6-6400k (all of them have one Piledriver module which is physical core).
But really terrible.
modern CPUs (from AMD and Intel) will just 'park' unneeded cores...
Not sure where you would get that info.
What you might have heard is something along the lines of "Single Core performance matters in many older games" yes that is true, which is why Intel has been the king in this area.
All CPUs are Multi-Core now, you'd basically have to go back to Pentium4 series to get a Single Core CPU, which was also not 64bit capable. Between the Multi-Core CPU, the OS, and the Game; those can dictate how the CPU is best used to unleash it's performance.
Many games strive on strong single core performance; are the other cores wasted? NO, the OS will continue to use those in the background. But many games coded poorly might use nearly 100% of a single core at any given time; so having a CPU with strong "Single Core IPC output" is best bet for such apps/games. AMD for example has come up in the game of multi-core performance; however it still falls short in single-core performance. Intel does fairly great at BOTH.
yes the will "park" those core in C-States and allow with Turbo Boost to boost that remaining core by Auto- Overclocking it. So a quadcore or better will still give a betetr single core performance.