Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you can also upgrade to a 7gen i5 or i7
and yes all intelk cpus have thermal paste inside
One would assume the CPU had some kind of Thermal Interface. Coffeelake has a hell of a reputation for Overclocking, I can't see a CPU with no stock TIM hitting 5.0 GHz.
Yeah, but you're not going to buy an 8400 for overclocking. It's a Fixed Ratio CPU.
And if you were spending the money on De-Lidding, surely you'd start with a prime Binned 8700K?
Ambient temp has very, very little effect on how your CPU operates. I live in Victoria, Australia, which has massive seasonal variation. During summer we get 110+ and in winter we get sleet and snow. My CPU temps are virtually the same, all year round. I've never noticed hotter temperatures, even on insanely hot summer days. And I would notice, because there's an enormous CPU temp guage in my peripheral vision whenever I'm using this PC.
I would say the variation is less than a degree celsius.
An 8400 will produce very little heat. It's effectively an office CPU, it's de-tuned to run cold. It may actually run colder than an equivalent Ryzen, for all you know. Even a basic heatsink will easily keep it within 50 degrees at maximum load, given it was designed and tuned for Intel's tiny Stock Heatsinks.
You have absolutely no reason to worry about temperatures. My 6700K is overclocked to the upper-limit of sanity(4.8 Ghz) and runs a mid-sized Air Cooler. And I'm only getting 65 celsius under maximum load, come rain, hail or shine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBL4sTPUh7Y&t=2m18s
However, since the 8400 is a relatively low profile CPU as was mentioned above, you won't really have troubles with temps as long as it's cooled well. But if you're so concerned about it, then it might be worth waiting for the new AMD chips.
I respect and admire your faith in AMD, but it's somewhat misplaced. We don't live in a world where lovable losers can compete with industry titans, that's a myth created by Hollywood.
AMD exists on Intel's forebearance, because AMD is more useful alive than dead. AMD's token competition protects Intel from prosecution or punishment for it's near-total market dominance. If AMD ever provided real competition, I fully expect Intel would wipe it from existance. They have the resources to do so, easily.
AMD will never out-develop Intel, since Intel's R&D devision is probably larger than Intel's entire employee count. And because Intel's research budget is likely higher than AMD's total revenue. Intel can afford to hire and retain the very best, throw huge amounts of cash at projects, and absorb R&D failures much more easily. AMD has to take a more conservative approach, as proven by Ryzen's utterly conventional design.
8000 series doesnt work on same motherboard as 6000 and 7000 series despite same socket.
If you're so convinced to buy AMD, and so unwilling to listen to any evidence to the contrary, then buy AMD. By all means, go ahead.