Ryzen 3 2200g + 6gb gtx 1060

[Speef]

I'm new to pc building and was wondering if this would be a could combo, if not please tell me what I should get and why. Thank you

EDIT: thank you for the help, ill take the advice of waiting for the new gen of Ryzen and nvidia gpus

[Big Boom Boom]

Why not? Although I don't understand why you want the 2200g when say 1200/1300x is cheaper.

[upcoast]

You'd just be over spending.

Ps, right now is the worst ever time to build a PC cost wise between Ram and GPUs being very pricey.

Post a budget and maybe we can point you in a direction, do you have a working PC now and what are the parts in it if you do?

[flya00]

I heard some rumours of the new gtx 2000 series arriving in April, and also ram and gpu prices at slowly dropping so maybe you should wait a bit. I built my pc in November, but I couldn't afford ram until December I bought because it kept rising and I thought I might not ever get it.
So I suggest you wait a bit longer.

[Malygos]

Dont new line will be announced soon and if you get it warly release most likely will be cheaper because of mining and why skimp on the cpu if you are gonna buy a $300 gpu?

[76561198399520696]

You may get a 2400G and pair a proper graphics card later.

[King_BR0K]

Wait a bit, next Gen Ryzen and gtx are coming soon

[Astro_80 (WASH YOUR HANDS!)]

İlk olarak Big Boom Boom tarafından gönderildi:

Why not? Although I don't understand why you want the 2200g when say 1200/1300x is cheaper.

This.

[King_BR0K]

İlk olarak Big Boom Boom tarafından gönderildi:

Why not? Although I don't understand why you want the 2200g when say 1200/1300x is cheaper.

It is slightly faster and cheaper
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-3-2200G-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3-1200/m441832vs3931

[vadim]

Both Ryzen 2200g and 2400g have only 8 PCI-E lanes, so they cannot support discrete graphics at their full speed. On other hand, GTX 1060 is mid-level card and 8 lanes should be enough in most cases. Unless you going to add additional PCI-E devices which will use CPU and not chipset lanes. But in general Ryzen 1300X obviously should be better choice.
As a rule of a thumb, avoid using 2200g if you going to buy discrete graphics.

[Big Boom Boom]

İlk olarak vadim tarafından gönderildi:

Both Ryzen 2200g and 2400g have only 8 PCI-E lanes, so they cannot support discrete graphics at their full speed. On other hand, GTX 1060 is mid-level card and 8 lanes should be enough in most cases. Unless you going to add additional PCI-E devices which will use CPU and not chipset lanes. But in general Ryzen 1300X obviously should be better choice.
As a rule of a thumb, avoid using 2200g if you going to buy discrete graphics.

Again, testing at 4K show min loss if any running a GTX 1080...

[King_BR0K]

İlk olarak vadim tarafından gönderildi:

Both Ryzen 2200g and 2400g have only 8 PCI-E lanes, so they cannot support discrete graphics at their full speed. On other hand, GTX 1060 is mid-level card and 8 lanes should be enough in most cases. Unless you going to add additional PCI-E devices which will use CPU and not chipset lanes. But in general Ryzen 1300X obviously should be better choice.
As a rule of a thumb, avoid using 2200g if you going to buy discrete graphics.

From the reports i saw not even a 1080ti weider suffer significantly...
But I might be wrong

[Big Boom Boom]

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_2400G_Vega_11/16.html

Tested with 2400G, not with a "superior" Intel CPU running on x8.

Notice how it "beats" "superior" i9-7900x with all its glorious 44 PCIe lanes at 4K in Rise of Tomb Raider.

[vadim]

İlk olarak Big Boom Boom tarafından gönderildi:

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_2400G_Vega_11/16.html

Tested with 2400G, not with a "superior" Intel CPU running on x8.

Notice how it "beats" "superior" i9-7900x with all its glorious 44 PCIe lanes at 4K in Rise of Tomb Raider.

Have you noticed that 2200g not only in ALL cases slower than Core i3. ANY i3. Including obsolete dual-core models. No. It also in all cases slower than Ryzen 1300x and almost in all cases (excluding single one) slower than Ryzen 1200. Despite 1200 has significally lower clock rate.
Does this tell you anything?

[Big Boom Boom]

İlk olarak vadim tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Big Boom Boom tarafından gönderildi:

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_2400G_Vega_11/16.html

Tested with 2400G, not with a "superior" Intel CPU running on x8.

Notice how it "beats" "superior" i9-7900x with all its glorious 44 PCIe lanes at 4K in Rise of Tomb Raider.

Have you noticed that 2200g not only in ALL cases slower than Core i3. ANY i3. Including obsolete dual-core models. No. It also in all cases slower than Ryzen 1300x and almost in all cases (excluding single one) slower than Ryzen 1200. Despite 1200 has significally lower clock rate.
Does this tell you anything?

Yes, 1% slower, such wide gap. Pray tell, why is the i9-7900X with all of its 44 PCIe lane the SLOWEST in ROTTR?

Oh and bonus point, i5-7400 is slower on average compare to i3-7100. WTF?

[vadim]

It was you, the one who published this link. Why are you asking me? I just drew your attention to the fact that it makes no sense to buy 2200g instead of old Ryzen 3s.