Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Built in speakers are generally crap and a cheapo $20 speaker will do heaps better
The only benefit that Freesync adds is that it dynamically changes the refresh rate to match your FPS? In general, I get FPS in the 90s to 100s range, so I assume that Freesync isn't going to offer much difference?
As for the speakers, this monitor uses Harman Kardon speakers. I've heard these things in action during an Asus showcase event, they're actually quite nice! The above-average speakers are an added bonus really, as I mostly use my headphones anyway.
I'm mainly just waiting for the official reviews before dishing out the cash, cause apparently it hasn't been covered by any of the major outlets.
Yes they match the frame with the FPS as much as possible to try, and eliminate screen tearing, which think of it as Vsync, but better.
The difference you will see if you were using an AMD GPU, with that Freesync monitor, is better fluid image quality, as well little to no screen tearing, the higher the screen refresh rate the lower the odds of getting screen tearing, with Free/G-Sync feature it reduces the odds of even seeing screen tearing allowing you to have a much smoother gameplay.
-edit-
Fix some thing by auto correct on phone.
Oh ok, that's not too big of a deal then. I've always been gaming on a standard run of the mill IPS monitor with an equally run of the mill refresh rate of 60 Hz. If anything, the increases refresh rate will an additional bit of fluidity to what I'm otherwise used to I suppose. Maybe in the future, when G-Sync goes mainstream, I might eventually upgrade to a 144Hz with G-Sync. But as it stands, I'm currently not invested enough to spend so much money on a specialized gaming monitor just to play Forza 7.
I'll just wait for some reviews to come out before deciding to get this (just to get an idea on the rest of the panel like image quality and performance) before making a decision.
Thanks for the answers everyone!
No Sync > Fast Sync/Enhanced Sync > Gsync/FreeSync > Vsync in terms of input lag.
If you want ninja stuff, well not really ninja, GFE Beta adds Freestyle. It's similar to ReShade that you can add graphic effects to supported games.
On a different note, anyone got any opinions on the monitor I posted earlier, or know some good alternatives to consider in the same strain?
if all things are equal, gysync/freesync > fast sync/enhanced sync. i guess if you have to enable a frame rate limiter to keep fps below your monitor's refresh rate, perhaps that could push input lag beyond that of an uncapped fast sync/enhanced sync.
Nope, Gsync/Freesync will always be slower than Fast Sync/Enhanced Sync. Auto mode vs hands off, there is less to be processed on Fast/Enhanced Sync side and therefore less to add to input lag.
Anyway FreeStyle is a filter onto the game itself, not just screenshot. Actually Freestyle doesn't work with Steam screenshot.
where are you getting your information? do you have a link to the article?