Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Other than that - game might be looking at free vram (or vram it can use), not those physically available.
list your complete pc specs for clarity...
I Ran 660 Ti's in SLI and this is the FIRST Time i've ever heard of this, so proof would be appreciated.
-
RDR2 is more demanding in general than the other games you play, its also not 100% optimized so thats an issue for such an old card as well.
The other problem you are likely to be running into is, if you only have 8GB of RAM.
When VRAM gets maxed or nearly maxed it starts using Physical RAM as Shared Video Memory, meaning the system can use up to HALF your Physical RAM as Graphic Memory, so if you only have 8GB then up to 4GB can be used and that wont be leaving you much left over, which is why in cases like these 16GB is best to have as theres plenty left over for general performance.
I ran into that exact problem a few years ago with ARK, once i upgraded to 16GB my overall performance improved in such situations. I also upgraded to a 1060 6GB a few years ago, MUCH better than SLI 660 Ti's in every sense.
Its time to save up for a new GPU bud, even a modern GPU with 4GB VRAM gives more performance than the 660 Ti while using much less power.
For the naysayers that dont know about Shared Memory being used in the way i mention, open task Manager and go to the GPU tab, Shared GPU memory is listed there and will be shown as Half your physical RAM.
Oh, and your "Missing" VRAM is probably hardware reserved or being used for something in the background, either way, its not enough to make a difference in that game even if you did have the full amount available as i explained above.
It's really time for a new gpu, such as GTX 1660 Super or better.
What's the rest of your full hardware specs? What OS edition, version, build?
GTX 660 Ti will mix up the number of chips attached to each controller in order to get 2GB out of 8 chips. Specifically, there will be 4 chips instead of 2 attached to one of the memory controllers, while the other controllers will continue to have 2 chips.
The best case scenario is always going to be that the entire 192bit bus is in use by interleaving a memory operation across all 3 controllers, giving the card 144GB/sec of memory bandwidth (192bit * 6GHz / 8). But that can only be done at up to 1.5GB of memory; the final 512MB of memory is attached to a single memory controller. This invokes the worst case scenario, where only 1 64-bit memory controller is in use and thereby reducing memory bandwidth to a much more modest 48GB/sec.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/6159/the-geforce-gtx-660-ti-review/2
Thought the memory thing was common knowledge, but if ou want proof the link Ralf gave above is a good place to start. 660 (Ti) is also not the only card that has such configuration, any card that has 192bit, 384bit, etc memory bus and nice round 2GB/4GB/8GB of memory inevitably has the same issue. Similarly to how you can not have, for example, 9Gb of proper dual channel system memory.
CPU Vendor: GenuineIntel
CPU Brand: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz
CPU Family: 0x6
CPU Model: 0x2a
CPU Stepping: 0x7
CPU Type: 0x0
Video Card:
Driver: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
DirectX Driver Name: nvldumd.dll
Driver Version: 26.21.14.4120
DirectX Driver Version: 26.21.14.4120
Driver Date: 11 6 2019
OpenGL Version: 4.6
Desktop Color Depth: 32 bits per pixel
Monitor Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
DirectX Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
VendorID: 0x10de
DeviceID: 0x1183
Revision: 0xa1
Number of Monitors: 1
Number of Logical Video Cards: 1
No SLI or Crossfire Detected
Primary Display Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Desktop Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Primary Display Size: 20.08" x 11.30" (23.03" diag)
51.0cm x 28.7cm (58.5cm diag)
Primary Bus: PCI Express 4x
Primary VRAM: 2047 MB
Supported MSAA Modes: 2x 4x 8x
Like I said I know it's old and I need to upgrade, But i figured since I could play GTA 5 on pretty high settings I'd at least be able to play rdr2 on 1920X1080 on Medium settings, But because it doesnt use the full 2047mb of ram for rdr2 I can't even set it to 1920x1080 on low graphics without it going over the 16k Ram it restricts me to.
Get an RX 570 if your budget is tight, otherwise one of the 1660 cards
This is the one I'm thinking about going with so far. My budgest is in the $1300-$1500 range. I'm going prebuilt because of my little knowledge on the matter and no one around me to help build.
I mean seriously, building it yourself will get you a 2080 Super over a 2060 Super, huge difference in performance, and prebuilts often come with cheap components in them.
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-2080S-Super-vs-Nvidia-RTX-2060S-Super/4050vs4049
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZaFqY8UF6I