Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
do u know why the 1060 has 3gb?
im watching a video of it, all of its vram is being used but its maintaining close to 60fps
if the gtx 1050 ti had 8gb vram it would be a waste for several reasons and still worse than the gtx 1060 3gb... that said both cards are not really for ultra gaming on 60 fps for the newest games cuz both are too weak for that...
The amount of Shared Video Memory available depends on how much RAM you have, if for example you have 8GB RAM up to 4GB may be used for shared memory, essentially, half of whatever RAM you have may be used to help minimize the effects of maxing out your VRAM.
This is why its always a good idea to have 8-16GB RAM when it comes to GPUs with VRAM under 4GB for games that can use a lot of VRAM.
You can view this on Win10 by opening the Task Manager, go to Performance and click on the GPU tab where it will list Dedicated GPU memory usage and Shared GPU memory (Which as mentioned will be HALF of your Physical RAM).
Yeah it does, I wanted to know.
I'll google it.
Ah cool.
I just seen a video were the 1060 3gb got more fps than a 1050 ti 4gb. Even though the 1060 had 100 percent vram usage and the 1050 was using a little over 3gb.
So, I guess the ram made up for the lost of vram for the 1060.
At first, I was thinking that the 1060 3gb was just so fast that it didnt need the over 3gb, if that makes sense.
Someone helped me out already. But thanks
https://www.hwcompare.com/31385/geforce-gtx-1060-vs-geforce-gtx-1060-3gb/
Nvidia should have just released the 3gb as either "1060" or "1050 ti"
Leaving the 1060 6GB to either be " 1060" or "1060 ti"
With them just being labeled as 1060, people seem to think the only difference then between the two base models is the difference in vram, which would be wrong
its just that there are 3 vers of the 1060
they should have brough back the se/le/gs/gt sub categories for it
nvidia seriously needs help naming the cards
almost as much as usb 3.x gex x xx
https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2019/2/27/18243425/usb-3-2-standard-names-connectivity-cables-innovators-forum
Overall given how many models in the gtx family are out now, it probably would have made more sense to not even release the 1060 3gb